1. Gonçalves J. L. Pathogen effects on milk yield and composition in chronic subclinical mastitis in dairy cows / J. L. Gonçalves [et al.] // Veterinary Journal. 2020. Vol. 262. Article number 105473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2020.105473
2. Gai N. Effect of protein genotypes on physicochemical properties and protein functionality of bovine milk: A review / N. Gai [et al.] // Foods. 2021. Vol. 10(10). Article number 2409. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10102409
3. Лоретц, О. Г. Технологические свойства молока в зависимости от сезона года / О. Г. Лоретц, О. В. Горелик, О. П. Неверова // БИО. 2019. № 1(220). С. 8–11. https://elibrary.ru/qrioya
4. Pegolo, S. Associations between differential somatic cell count and milk yield, quality, and technological characteristics in Holstein cows / S. Pegolo [et al.] // Journal of Dairy Science. 2021. Vol. 104(4). P. 4822–4836. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19084
5. Карпеня, М. М. Влияние содержания соматических клеток и бактериальной обсемененности молока-сырья на структуру его переработки / М. М. Карпеня [и др.] // Ученые записки учреждения образования Витебская ордена Знак почета государственная академия ветеринарной медицины. 2017. Т. 53, № 4. С. 114–117. https://elibrary.ru/ymqvpd
6. Гаджиев, З. К. Полиморфизм гена CSN2 (бета-казеин) у коров молочного направления продуктивности / З. К. Гаджиев [и др.] // Известия Горского государственного аграрного университета. 2025. Т. 62, № 2. С. 31–38. https://doi.org/10.54258/20701047_2025_62_2_31; https://elibrary.ru/dewews
7. Amalfitano, N. Role of CSN2, CSN3, and BLG genes and the polygenic background in the cattle milk protein profile / N. Amalfitano [et al.] // Journal of Dairy Science. 2022. Vol. 105(7). P. 6001–6020. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-21421
8. Mahmoudi, P. Strong evidence for association between K232A polymorphism of the DGAT1 gene and milk fat and protein contents: A meta-analysis / P. Mahmoudi, A. Rashidi // Journal of Dairy Science. 2023. Vol. 106(4). P. 2573–2587. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22315
9. Andrade, T. E. G. The DRB3 gene of the bovine major histocompatibility complex: discovery, diversity and distribution of alleles in commercial breeds of cattle and applications for development of vaccines / T. E. G. Andrade [et al.] // Journal of Dairy Science. 2024. Vol. 107(12). P. 11324–11341. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2023-24628
10. Tizard, I. R. Chapter 9 - BoLA: the bovine major histocompatibility complex // The Immunology of the Domestic Ruminants. Ed. by I. R. Tizard. – Academic Press, 2025. – P. 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-33572-3.00009-6
11. Doublet, A. C. The impact of genomic selection on genetic diversity and genetic gain in three French dairy cattle breeds / A. C. Doublet [et al.] // Genetics, Selection, Evolution. 2019. Vol. 51. Article number 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0495-1
12. Salek, F. Factors affecting the success of ovum pick-up, in vitro production and cryopreservation of embryos in cattle / F. Salek [et al.] // Animals. 2025. Vol. 15(3). Article number 344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15030344
13. Mapletoft, R. J. History and perspectives on bovine embryo transfer / R. J. Mapletoft // Animal Reproduction. 2018. Vol. 10(3). P. 168–173.
14. Funnell, B. Disease risk of in vitro produced embryos: A review of current commercial practices in the context of international trade with emphasis on bovine embryos / B. Funnell [et al.] // Theriogenology. 2024. Vol. 230. P. 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.09.019
15. Pacheco, H. A. Invited review: Phenotyping strategies and genetic background of dairy cattle behavior in intensive production systems—From trait definition to genomic selection / H. A. Pacheco [et al.] // Journal of Dairy Science. 2025. Vol. 108(1). P. 6–32. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-24953
16. Кнуров, Д. А. Перспективы развития скотоводства путем трансплантации эмбрионов / Д. А. Кнуров, А. В. Игнатьев, Д. В. Иванова // Эффективное животноводство. 2023. № 5(187). С. 22–23. https://elibrary.ru/cyjmix
17. Мадисон, В. В. Эмбриотрансфер на производстве: I. Юбилеи и статистика / В. В. Мадисон, Л. В. Мадисон // Вестник Чувашского государственного аграрного университета. 2025. № 1(32). С. 118–126. https://doi.org/10.48612/vch/13a3-4kb2-8uza; https://elibrary.ru/qzcktd
18. Iamartino, D. FECUND EU-Project: Optimisation of early reproductive success in dairy cattle through the definition of new trait and improved reproductive biotechnology // Animal Reproduction Science. 2014. Vol. 149(1–2). P. 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.06.015
19. Amin, A. B. Influence of yeast on rumen fermentation, growth performance and quality of products in ruminants: A review / A. B. Amin, Sh. Mao // Animal Nutrition. 2021. Vol. 7(1). – P. 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.10.005
20. Yang, J. Understanding the differences in rumen bacteria and their impact on dairy cows’ production performance: A review / J. Yang [et al.] // Animal Nutrition. 2025. Vol. 22. P. 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2025.04.006
21. By, W. C. Bacillus subtilis co-transfected with a lysine-rich and a methionine-rich protein gene and its effect on cow milk production / W. C. By [et al.] // Journal of Northeast Agricultural University (English Edition). 2016. Vol. 23(4). P. 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-8104(17)30006-5
22. Sun, P. Effects of Bacillus subtilis natto on milk production, rumen fermentation and ruminal microbiome of dairy cows / P. Sun, J. Q. Wang, L. F. Deng // Animal. 2013. Vol. 7(2). P. 216–222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112001188
23. Martinez, O. A. Effects of feeding a fibrolytic enzyme to Holstein dairy cows on milk production and reproduction / O. A. Martinez [et al.] // Applied Animal Science. 2023. Vol. 39(5). P. 306–316. https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2023-02386
24. Yang, J. Lactational performance, feeding behavior, ruminal fermentation and nutrient digestibility in dairy cows fed whole-plant faba bean silage-based diet with fibrolytic enzyme / J. Yang[et al.] // Animal. 2022. Vol. 16(9). Article number 100606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2022.100606
25. Juckem, K. A. Effect of dietary starch concentration and direct-fed microbial supplementation on lactation performance, total-tract nutrient digestibility, and enteric methane emissions by dairy cows / K. A. Juckem [et al.] // Journal of Dairy Science. 2025. Vol. 108(11). P. 12257–12274. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-26694
26. McGuffey, R. K. A 100-Year Review: Metabolic modifiers in dairy cattle nutrition // Journal of Dairy Science. 2017. Vol. 100, № 12. P. 10113–10142. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12987
27. Elmhadi, M. E. Subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy herds: Microbiological and nutritional causes, consequences, and prevention strategies / M. E. Elmhadi [et al.] // Animal Nutrition. 2022. Vol. 10. P. 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.12.008
28. Бикчантаев, И. Т. Эффективность новых штаммов молочнокислых бактерий и B. licheniformis в консервировании кукурузы / И. Т. Бикчантаев, Д. М. Афордоаньи // Аграрный научный журнал. 2022. № 4. С. 53–56. https://doi.org/10.28983/asj.y2022i4pp53-56; https://elibrary.ru/wgklbd
29. Yan, X. High-moisture alfalfa silage fermentation: a comparative study on the impact of additives including formic acid, Lactobacillus plantarum, cinnamon essential oil, and wood vinegar / X. Yan [et al.] // Microbiology Spectrum. 2025. Vol. 13(9). P. e00003-25. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00003-25; https://elibrary.ru/etyrzy
30. Muck, R. E. Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives / R. E. Muck [et al.] // Journal of Dairy Science. 2018. Vol. 101(5). P. 3980–4000. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13839
31. Kosicki, R. Multiannual mycotoxin survey in feed materials and feedingstuffs / R. Kosicki [et al.] // Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2016. Vol. 215. P. 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.03.012
32. Oliveira, A. S. Meta-analysis of effects of inoculation with homofermentative and facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and the performance of dairy cows / A. S. Oliveira [et al.] // Journal of Dairy Science. 2017. Vol. 100(6). P. 4587–4603. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11815
33. Akinmoladun, O. F. Multiple Mycotoxin Contamination in Livestock Feed: Implications for Animal Health, Productivity, and Food Safety / O. F. Akinmoladun [et al.] // Toxins. 2025. Vol. 17(8.). Article number 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17080365
34. Костомахин, Н. Контроль молока-сырья на содержание антибиотиков / Н. Костомахин, В. Остроухова, Т. Ананьева // Ветеринария сельскохозяйственных животных. 2024. № 9(222). С. 44–48. https://elibrary.ru/jmyjat
35. Андреева, А. А. Этиология и эпизоотология мастита коров (аналитический обзор) / А. А. Андреева [и др.] // Ветеринария сегодня. 2024. Т. 13, № 1. С. 27–35. https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2024-13-1-27-35; https://elibrary.ru/myqkgf
36. Ruiz-Romero, R. A. The role of non-aureus Staphylococcus in small ruminant mastitis: A systemic review on etiological agents, risk factors, virulence determinants, and novel treatments / R. A. Ruiz-Romero, N. Ghavipanje, E. Vargas-Bello-Perez // Small Ruminant Research. 2025. Vol. 245. Article number 107475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. smallrumres.2025.107475
37. Ma, Y. Anti-Inflammatory potential of lactic acid bacteria for dairy cows during the periparturient period / Y. Ma [et al.] // Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2025. Vol. 321. Article number 116234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116234
38. Tilocca, B. Milk microbiota: Characterization methods and role in cheese production / B. Tilocca [et al.] // Journal of Proteomics. 2020. Vol. 210. Article number 103534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2019.103534
39. Ngassam-Tchamba, C. In vitro and in vivo assessment of phage therapy against Staphylococcus aureus causing bovine mastitis / C. Ngassam-Tchamba [et al.] // Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance. 2020. Vol. 22. P. 762–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2020.06.020
40. Guo, M. Development and mouse model evaluation of a new phage cocktail intended as an alternative to antibiotics for treatment of Staphylococcus aureus-induced bovine mastitis / M. Guo [et al.] // Journal of Dairy Science. 2024. Vol. 107(8). P. 5974–5987. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-24540
41. Pereira, H. P. Evaluation and characterization of lytic phages and their recombinant endolysins for control of Staphylococcus aureus aiming to mitigate bovine mastitis / H. P. Pereira [et al.] // Microbial Pathogenesis. 2025. Vol. 199. Article number 107188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2024.107188
42. Gonal, B. N. Epidemiology, antimicrobial resistance, economic burden, and management approaches for staphylococcus aureus-associated bovine mastitis: a systematic review / B. N. Gonal [et al.] // Animals and Zoonoses. 2025 (In press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.azn.2025.12.001
43. Ruegg, P. L. A 100-Year Review: Mastitis detection, management, and prevention / P. L. Ruegg // Journal of Dairy Science. 2017. Vol. 100(12). P. 10381–10397. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13023
44. Zduńczyk, S. Bacteriophages and associated endolysins in therapy and prevention of mastitis and metritis in cows: Current knowledge / S. Zduńczyk, T. Janowski // Animal Reproduction Science. 2020. Vol. 218. Article number 106504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106504
45. Marković, K. G. Biofilms in dairy products: safety hazard or beneficial asset? / K. G. Marković, M. Ž. Grujović, O. D. Stefanović // International Dairy Journal. 2025. Vol. 171. Article number 106381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2025.106381
46. Desmousseaux, C. Biofilm Formation in Dairy: A Food Safety Concern—Biofilms in the milking machine, from laboratory scale to on-farm results / C. Desmousseaux [et al.] // Journal of Dairy Science. 2025. Vol. 108(8). P. 8120–8140. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25352
47. Meireles, A. The current knowledge on the application of anti-biofilm enzymes in the food industry / A. Meireles [et al.] // Food Research International. 2016. Vol. 86. P. 140– 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2016.06.006
48. Moreno, J. Comprehensive analysis of antimicrobial resistance, biofilm formation and virulence factors of staphylococci isolated from bovine mastitis / J. Moreno [et al.] // Heliyon. 2025. Vol. 11(4). Article number e42749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42749
49. Sabino, Y. N. V. Exopolysaccharides produced by Bacillus spp. inhibit biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus strains associated with bovine mastitis / Y. N. V. Sabino [et al.] // International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2023. Vol. 253. Article number 126689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126689
50. Sharma, V. Technological revolutions in smart farming: Current trends, challenges & future directions / V. Sharma, A. K. Tripathi, H. Mittal // Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2022. Vol. 201. Article number 107217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107217
51. Гулий, О. И. Биосенсорные системы для определения антибиотиков / О. И. Гулий [и др.] // Биофизика. 2021. Т. 66, № 4. С. 657–667. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0006302921040050; https://elibrary.ru/unlghn
52. Han, M. An octuplex lateral flow immunoassay for rapid detection of antibiotic residues, aflatoxin M1 and melamine in milk / M. Han [et al.] // Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2019. Vol. 292. P. 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2019.04.019
53. Islam, M. H. Agriculture 4.0 adoption challenges in the emerging economies: Implications for smart farming and sustainability / Md. H. Islam [et al.] // Journal of Economy and Technology. 2024. Vol. 2. P. 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ject.2024.09.002
54. Rutten, C. J. Invited review: Sensors to support health management on dairy farms / C. J. Rutten // Journal of Dairy Science. 2013. Vol. 96(4). P. 1928–1952. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6107
55. Liang, Q. Detection of water adulteration levels in milk using near-infrared spectroscopy combined with chemometrics / Q. Liang [et al.] // Journal of Dairy Science. 2025. Vol. 108(7). P. 6852–6866. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-26631
56. Xu, R. Recent advancements in chemometrics based non-destructive analytical techniques for rapid detection of adulterants in milk and dairy products – A review / R. Xu [et al.] // Food Control. 2025. Vol. 174. Article number 111247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2025.111247
57. Billah, M. Review: Genomic selection in the era of phenotyping based on digital images / M. Billah [et al.] // Animal. 2025. Vol. 19. Article number 101486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2025.101486
58. Stygar, A. H. Measuring dairy cow welfare with real-time sensor-based data and farm records: a concept study / A. H. Stygar [et al.] // Animal. 2023. Vol. 17(12). Article number 101023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.101023
59. Суховольский, О. Биотехнология в животноводстве / О. Суховольский // Ветеринария сельскохозяйственных животных. 2020. № 5. С. 3–8. https://elibrary.ru/vdcdeo
60. Мордвинова, В. А. Развитие системы стандартизации РФ в области сыроделия / В. А. Мордвинова, Н. Н. Оносовская // Сыроделие и маслоделие. 2020. № 1. С. 10–12. https://doi.org/10.31515/2073-4018-2020-1-10-12; https://elibrary.ru/xbpwjs
61. Илларионова, Е. Е. Ассоциация полиморфизмов в биокластере генов казеина и сывороточных белков с технологическими свойствами молочного сырья / Е. Е. Илларионова [и др.] // Молочная промышленность. 2021. № 3. С. 60–62. https://doi.org/10.31515/1019-8946-2021-03-60-62; https://elibrary.ru/qdervg
62. Асафов, В. А. Новые технологии и качество молочных продуктов / В. А. Асафов, В. Д. Харитонов // Молочная промышленность. 2018. № 10. С. 39–41. https://elibrary.ru/yamkvv
