UDC
63

OPTIMIZING PROBIOTIC STARTER CONSORTIA FOR SHELF-STABLE FROZEN YOGURT Optimizing Probiotic Starter Consortia for Shelf-Stable Frozen Yogurt

Published in Dairy industry · Pages 26–35 · Rubric: Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/1019-8946-2026-4-94 · EDN: MNQUTS
Received: 27.02.2026 Accepted: 09.06.2026 Published: 17.08.2026 Language of publication: RUS
Fermented milk ice cream is a functional product with a long shelf life. Currently, the starter microflora for this type of ice cream relies on only three probiotic microorganisms: Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, and Lactobacillus acidophilus. This study investigated the feasibility of incorporating propionic acid bacteria into a probiotic starter consortium for fermented milk ice cream. Rheological, microstructural, thermomechanical, microbiological, and physicochemical analyses were performed on ice cream samples produced using consortia of Propionibacterium freudenreichii subsp. shermanii “EYES 2” combined with either Lb. acidophilus or Lb. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus. The microbial consortia ensured efficient fermentation within five hours. Notably, the count of propionibacteria was an order of magnitude higher than that of Lb. bulgaricus and Lb. acidophilus. The evaluation of organic acids post-fermentation revealed a metabolic shift in propionibacteria, evidenced by the absence of propionic acid. Although the viability of propionibacteria decreased during freezing, hardening, and subsequent six-month storage due to thermomechanical stress and aeration, the counts of all microorganisms remained compliant with regulatory requirements. The quality assessment revealed distinct variations in dynamic viscosity and relative hardness, suggesting the synthesis of extracellular polysaccharides by the consortium of propionibacteria and Lb. bulgaricus. Overall, combining propionibacteria with Lb. bulgaricus and Lb. acidophilus proved highly effective. These novel consortia, utilizing propionic acid bacteria with specific metabolic traits, hold strong potential for enhancing frozen dairy products without additional fermentation.
propionic acid microorganisms, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, fermentation of dairy mix, microbial survival, metabolism
Funding
The article was prepared as part of the research carried out under the state assignment FGUS-2025-0003 of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems” of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Text References
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Galochkina, N. A. Termofil'nyy streptokokk: tehnologicheskaya funkcional'nost' v pischevyh sistemah, poleznye dlya zdorov'ya produkty metabolizma, vidovaya identifikaciya / N. A. Galochkina, I. A. Glotova, A. A. Tolkacheva // Tehnologii pischevoy i pererabatyvayuschey promyshlennosti APK – produkty zdorovogo pitaniya. 2024. № 1. S. 44–50. https://doi.org/10.24412/2311-6447-2024-1-44-50; https://elibrary.ru/vxymuv

2. Andreeva, A. V. Psihobiotiki: novoe napravlenie v psihofarmakologii, ili kak bakterii vliyayut na nash mozg? / I. V. Andreeva [i dr.] // Klinicheskaya mikrobiologiya i antimikrobnaya himioterapiya. 2022. T. 24, № 2. S. 108–133. https://doi.org/10.36488/cmac.2022.2.108-133; https://elibrary.ru/dyajzp

3. Dbar, S. D. Novoe pokolenie probiotikov - psihobiotiki, ih naznachenie i funkcii / S. D. Dbar, L. G. Stoyanova // Antibiotiki i himioterapiya. 2021. T. 66, № 9-10. S. 64–80. https://doi.org/10.37489/0235-2990-2021-66-9-10-64-78; https://elibrary.ru/lxmwyt

4. Park, B. H. Probiotic effect of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris RPG-HL-0136 on intestinal mucosal immunity in mice / B. H. Park [et al.] // Applied Biological Chemistry. 2021. Vol. 64(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-021-00667-6

5. Darby, T. M. Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris is an efficacious beneficial bacterium that limits tissue injury in the intestine / T. M. Darby [et al.] // iScience. 2019. Vol. 12. P. 356 – 367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2019.01.030

6. Sviridenko, G. M. Vliyanie osnovnoy kislotoobrazuyuschey mikroflory bakterial'nyh zakvasok na formirovanie organolepticheskogo profilya syrov s nizkoy temperaturoy vtorogo nagrevaniya / G. M. Sviridenko, O. M. Shuhalova, D. S. Mamykin // Molochnaya promyshlennost'. 2024. № 5. S. 50–5. https://doi.org/10.21603/1019-8946-2024-5-12; https://elibrary.ru/znsgcn

7. Fusieger, A. Technological properties of Lactococcuslactis subsp. lactis bv. diacetylactis obtained from dairy and non-dairy niches / A. Fusieger [et al.] // Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2020. Vol. 51(1). P. 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-019-00182-3

8. Sorokina, A. S. Perspektivy proizvodstva kislomolochnogo morozhenogo kak sinbioticheskogo produkta / A. S. Sorokina, A. A. Tvorogova // Holodil'naya tehnika. 2017. № 11. S. 48–51. https://elibrary.ru/yqnpqv

9. Tochilina, A. G. Osobennosti genoma probioticheskih bifidobakteriy, determiniruyuschie ih shtammospecificheskie svoystva / A. G. Tochilina [i dr.] // Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine. 2022. T. 14, № 5. S. 36–44. https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2022.14.5.04; https://elibrary.ru/zfcbko

10. Zimnyakov, V. M. Formirovanie potrebitel'skih svoystv tradicionnyh kislomolochnyh napitkov / V. M. Zimnyakov, I. V. Gavryushina // Niva Povolzh'ya. 2015. № 2(35). S. 26–31. https://elibrary.ru/uccvxv

11. Evivie, S. E. Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus KLDS 1.0207 exerts antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects in vitro and improves blood biochemical parameters in vivo against notable foodborne pathogens / S. E. Evivie [et al.] // Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020. Vol. 11(1JAN). Art. no. 583070. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.583070

12. Boyarineva, I. V. Probioticheskie svoystva i aktual'nost' prakticheskogo primeneniya L. acidophilus / I. V. Boyarineva // Vestnik Habarovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2021. № 2(106). S. 70–75. https://doi.org/10.38161/2618-9526-2021-2-70-75; https://elibrary.ru/uoeefx

13. Stoyanova, L. G. Metabioticheskie svoystva shtammov Lactobacillus acidophilus, vhodyaschih v kompleksnye zakvaski dlya proizvodstva probioticheskih molochnyh produktov / L. G. Stoyanova, S. D. Dbar, I. S. Polyanskaya // Biotehnologiya. 2022. T. 38, № 1. S. 3–12. https://doi.org/10.56304/S0234275822010070; https://elibrary.ru/bimhwp

14. Milent'eva, I. S. Issledovanie probioticheskih svoystv bakteriy roda Propionibacterium / I. S. Milent'eva, O. V. Kozlova, N. I. Eremeeva // Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pischevye i biotehnologii. 2021. T. 9, № 2. S. 83–92. https://doi.org/10.14529/food210209; https://elibrary.ru/iifqhd

15. Logvinova, T. I. Ispol'zovanie propionovokislyh mikroorganizmov: ot teorii k praktike / T. I. Logvinova // Zhivotnovodstvo i kormoproizvodstvo. 2023. T. 106, № 4. S. 164–177. https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-106-4-164; https://elibrary.ru/xlnnno

16. Hamagaeva, I. S. Biotehnologiya zakvasok propionovokislyh bakteriy / I. S. Hamagaeva, L. M. Kachanina, S. M. Tumurova. – Ulan-Ude: izd-vo VSGTU, 2006. – 172 s.

17. Murray, A. Trehalose in cryopreservation. Applications, mechanisms and intracellular delivery opportunities / A. Murray, P. Kilbride, M. I. Gibson // RSC Medicinal Chemistry. 2024. Vol. 15. R. 2980–2995. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4MD00174E

18. Begunova, A. V. Ocenka probioticheskogo potenciala i funkcional'nyh svoystv Lactobacillus reuteri LR1 in vitro / A. V. Begunova [i dr.] // Prikladnaya biohimiya i mikrobiologiya. 2020. T. 56. № 5. S. 472–482. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0555109920050049; https://elibrary.ru/xuktvq

19. Vorob'eva, L. I. Propionovokislye bakterii / L. I. Vorob'eva. – M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1995. – 288 s.

20. Landihovskaya, A. V. Pokazateli kachestva molochnogo morozhenogo s citrusovymi voloknami i kamedyami / A. V. Landihovskaya, A. A. Tvorogova // Pischevye sistemy. 2023. T. 6, № 2. S. 261–268. https://doi.org/10.21323/2618-9771-2023-6-2-261-268; https://elibrary.ru/fpjitf