UDC 342.56
The discourse of moral values in jurisprudence is both a political and a legal issue. Moral values influence human beliefs and, consequently, the actions of lawyers, who are hardly aware of that influence. Appeals to moral values in court are often associated with the natural law theory, whereas legal positivism considers this appeal unacceptable. However, the recent years have seen a significant increase in the number of proponents of value-based justification for judicial acts. This trend requires a deeper reflection on the dangers warned about by the critics of axiological approach. No less important is the problem of determining the spectrum of tools and methods for resolving collisions between legally relevant values. Using the formal-legal (dogmatic) method and the analysis method, the author analyzed various functions that moral values perform in the sphere of law and justice. In law, values proved to act as (a) elements of judicial evaluation, (b) criteria for assessing legal facts, (c) social regulator, subsidiary to law, (d) auxiliary instruments for interpreting legal norms. While the very procedure of judicial discretion already implies a certain axiological aspect, this thesis does not contradict even the most exclusive legal positivism.
law enforcement, value, legal norm, legal positivism, natural law, judicial weighing
1. Zorkin V. D. Value approach to constitutional regulation of rights and freedoms. Journal of Russian Law, 2008, (12): 3–14. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/oalrvl
2. Mamonov V. V. The constitutional values of modern Russia. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi iuridicheskoi akademii, 2013, (4): 125–132. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rsbtbx
3. Gadzhiev G. A. New constitutional values: The concept of sustainable economic growth from the legal capitalization perspective. Journal of Russian Law, 2022, 26(1): 16–28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2022.002
4. Polyakov A. V. The constitution of Russia, traditional values and the basic principle of law. The constitution and social progress. The second Prokopyev Readings: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Kaliningrad, 6–8 Dec 2018. Kaliningrad: IKBFU, 2019, 13–23. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/gfbdrw
5. Kropachev N. M., Arkhipov V. V. Traditional spiritual and moral values in the context of digital transformation of society: Aspects of legal theory. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 2023, 14(2): 294–306. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.201
6. Chestnov I. L. Values in law with the positions of postclassical methodology. Law and state: Problems of methodology, theory, and history: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Krasnodar, 10 May 2018. Krasnodar: Kru MIA Russia, 2018, 63–66. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ytipal
7. Bondar N. S. Constitution as a value and legal basis for resolving social conflicts: In the context of practice of The Constitutional Court of The Russian Federation. Comparative Constitutional Review, 2008, (2): 46–58. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ntoynb
8. Belov S. A. Jurisprudence of constitutional values: Origin, criticism and defense against it. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 11. Law, 2024, (2): 3–31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0113-11-65-2-1
9. Kraevsky A. A. Individual norms and logical inference: The theory of law enforcement by E. V. Bulygin. In: Antonov M. V., Varlamova N. V., Vasilyeva N. S. et al. How logic is possible in the law? St. Petersburg: Aleteya, 2022, 149–163. (In Russ.)
10. Kondurov V. E., Timoshina E. V. The Tyranny of Values in constitutional and supranational justice. Theoretical and applied ethics: Traditions and prospects 2020. Philosophy. Ethics. Practices: Proc. Intern. Sci. Conf., St. Petersburg, 19–21 Nov 2020. St. Petersburg: Sborka, 2020, 51–52. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ltodle
11. Gadzhiev G. A., Voinikanis E. A. Balancing of values and the value of balancing (part two). Voprosy Filosofii, 2021, (10): 53–64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2021-10-53-64
12. Bulygin E. V. Substantiating human rights. In: Bulygin E. V. The selected writings in theory and philosophy of law. St. Petersburg: Alef-Press, 2016, 66–72. (In Russ.)
13. Polyakov A. V. Is revival of the natural law in Russia possible? Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Pravovedenie, 2015, (5): 6–16. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vzvopn
14. Timoshina E. V. The "Tyranny of Values" as the "Will to Power": On the genealogy and effects of value discourse in justice. Russian Sociological Review, 2023, 22(3): 125–146. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2023-3-125-146
15. Polyakov A. V. Freedoms and human rights are also a traditional value. Statute, 2024, (12): 8–16. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jpefqx
16. Arkhipov V. V., Polyakov A. V., Timoshina E. V. Adaptation of precedent legal systems experience to the Russian legal system: A problem statement. Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Pravovedenie, 2012, (3): 113–134. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qakgyn
17. Kraevsky A. A., Timoshina E. V. Jus non scriptum: On the efficacy of legal customs and their application by Russian courts. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2020, (12): 87–97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250010660-9
18. Kelsen G. Pure theory of law, tr. Antonova M. V., Lezova S. V. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg: Alef-Press, 2015, 542. (In Russ.)
19. Polyakov A. V. The principle of mutual legal recognition: Russian philosophical and legal tradition and communicative approach to law. Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS, 2021, 16(6): 39–101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35427/2073-4522-2021-16-6-polyakov
20. Alchourron C. E., Bulygin E. V. Limits of logic and legal reasoning. In: Bulygin E. V. The selected writings in theory and philosophy of law. St. Petersburg: Alef-Press, 2016, 154–182. (In Russ.)
21. Belov S. A. Can rational discourse justify values choice in law? Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Pravovedenie, 2014, (5): 224–236. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tjxiqj
22. Belov S. A. The value-based approach to the Argumentation as a form of Judicial Activism of the Russian Constitutional Court. Comparative Constitutional Review, 2012, (2): 140–150. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/owvvnd
23. Belov S. A. The role of values in the administration of justice. Russian Justice, 2024, (12): 75–80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52433/01316761_2024_12_75
24. Timoshina E. V., Kraevsky A. A. Criteria for the normativity of interpretative legal acts in Russian judicial practice. Law Enforcement Review, 2022, 6(4): 220–243. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(4).220-243
25. Hart H. L. A. Positivism and the separation of law and morals. Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Pravovedenie, 2005, (5): 102–136. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jzatsn
