UDC 63

POST-OXIDATIVE ACTIVITY OF STREPTOCOCCUS THERMOPHILUS AND LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS STRAINS: DEVELOPING A STARTER CULTURE FOR FERMENTED BAKED DAIRY BIO-DRINK RYAZHENKA Post-Oxidative Activity of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus acidophilus Strains: Developing a Starter Culture for Fermented Baked Dairy Bio-Drink Ryazhenka

Published in Cheese- and buttermaking · Issue 3, 2026 · Pages 47–55 · Rubric: Original article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2073-4018-2026-3-62 · EDN: SQVBQP
Received: 14.04.2026 Accepted: 04.08.2026 Published: 09.09.2026 Language of publication: RUS
Fermented dairy products have a wide range of beneficial effects. As a result, their commercial popularity keeps growing worldwide. Recent years have witnessed a rise in the production of fermented dairy products with prolonged shelf life and probiotic properties. Excessive acidification during storage caused by the ongoing metabolism of lactic acid bacteria is a key defect leading to low product quality. Cultures of S. thermophilus and L. acidophilus were studied based on their acid-forming activity during storage: those possessing low post-acidification activity were used to develop a starter culture for the production of the traditional baked fermented milk (ryazhenka) with a prolonged shelf life. The research featured five strains of thermophilic streptococci (S. thermophilus 55, S. thermophilus 102, S. thermophilus BC 234, S. thermophilus 3t, S. thermophilus 19ch), three strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus NK1, L. acidophilus 4900, L. acidophilus 18a), and bio-ryazhenka samples produced using these cultures. The study involved microbiological methods for quantifying lactic acid bacteria (CFU/cm³), along with physicochemical methods for evaluating active acidity (pH), post-acidification activity (ΔpH), water-holding capacity, and conditional viscosity. The post-acidification activity of consortia of S. thermophilus 55 and L. acidophilus NK1 during 28-day storage at (4 ± 2) ºC yielded a starter culture with a ratio of 4.5:0.5 at an inoculum of 5% and a relatively low post-acidification activity (ΔpH 0.33 ± 0.03). The results can serve as a basis for developing new starter cultures used in the production of fermented dairy products.
starter culture, fermentation, bio-ryazhenka, post-acidification activity, conditional viscosity, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus acidophilus
Funding
The publication was prepared as part of the state assignment FNSS-2025-0004
Text References
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Kishilova, S. A. Sovremennye biotehnologicheskie resheniya v oblasti ispol'zovaniya molochnokislyh bakteriy dlya molochnoy promyshlennosti: ot selekcii shtammov do probioticheskih produktov / S. A. Kishilova [i dr.] // Tehnika i tehnologiya pischevyh proizvodstv. 2025. T. 55, № 3. S. 624–633. https://doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2025-3-2596; https://elibrary.ru/zvwsdn

2. Semenihina, V. F. Vliyanie mikroflory na kachestvo tvoroga / V. F. Semenihina [i dr.] // Molochnaya promyshlennost'. 2016. № 3. S. 51–53. https://elibrary.ru/vmbqtp

3. Gänzle, M. G. Lactic metabolism revisited: Metabolism of lactic acid bacteria in food fermentations and food spoilage / M. G. Gänzle // Current Opinion in Food Science. 2015. Vol. 2. P. 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2015.03.001

4. Alkadur, M. I. Issledovanie fiziko-himicheskih i mikrobiologicheskih svoystv raznyh shtammov Streptococcus thermophilus dlya ih ispol'zovaniya v proizvodstve kislomolochnogo produkta / M. I. Alkadur, A. V. Begunova, Z. V. Volokitina // Pischevye innovacii i biotehnologii: sbornik tezisov IX Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferencii studentov, aspirantov i molodyh uchenyh «Pischevye innovacii i biotehnologii». – Kemerovo: KemGU, 2021. – S. 166–168. https://elibrary.ru/jsetba

5. Svetlakova, E. V. Ispol'zovanie molochnokislyh bakteriy v biotehnologicheskih processah / E. V. Svetlakova [i dr.] // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2015. № 3. Nomer stat'i 559. https://elibrary.ru/tysosb

6. Akpoghelie, P. O. Food, health, and environmental impact of lactic acid bacteria: The superbacteria for posterity / P. O. Akpoghelie [et al.] // Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins. 2025. Vol. 17(5). P. 2819–2855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-025-10546-x

7. Pophaly, S. D. Functional starter cultures for fermented dairy products / S. D. Pophaly [et al.] // Microbial Cultures and Enzymes in Dairy Technology. 2018. P. 54–68. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5363-2.ch003

8. Kanochkina, M. S. Osobennosti podbora zakvasochnyh kul'tur v proizvodstve funkcional'nyh kislomolochnyh produktov / M. S. Kanochkina [i dr.] // Vestnik Murmanskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta. 2023. T. 26, № 4. S. 511–528. https://doi.org/10.21443/1560-9278-2023-26-4-511-528; https://elibrary.ru/podjxw

9. Eliseeva, T. Ryazhenka – 5 dokazannyh poleznyh svoystv i prostoy recept prigotovleniya / T. Eliseeva // Zhurnal zdorovogo pitaniya i dietologii. 2022. № 19. S. 40–43. https://doi.org/10.59316/.vi19.157; https://elibrary.ru/przhms

10. Kozhahmetova, A. B. Tehnologiya proizvodstva kislomolochnyh produktov v usloviyah TOO Agrofirma «Rodina» / A. B. Kozhahmetova, A. Zh. Bekkozhin // Respublikanskaya nauchno-teoreticheskaya konferenciya. 2017. № 2. S. 187–191.

11. Glazunova, E. S. Sravnitel'nyy analiz ryazhenki «Segodnya i vsegda» i «Belyy gorod» / E. S. Glazunova, O. A. Bykova // Molodezh' i nauka. 2022. № 2. Nomer stat'i 7. https://elibrary.ru/iyknhw

12. Kruchinin, A. G. Biologicheski aktivnye peptidy moloka: obzor / A. G. Kruchinin, E. Yu. Agarkova // Pischevaya promyshlennost'. 2020. № 12. S. 92–96. https://doi.org/10.24411/0235-2486-2020-10151; https://elibrary.ru/piiqsa

13. Ranjan, A. Advances in characterization of probiotics and challenges in industrial application / A. Ranjan [et al.] // Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews. 2024. Vol. 40(4). P. 3226–3269. https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2022.2122287

14. Suez, J. The pros, cons, and many unknowns of probiotics / J. Suez, E. Elinav, R. S. Sender // Nature Medicine. 2019. Vol. 25(5). P. 716–729. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0439-x

15. Rozhkova, I. V. Probioticheskie mikroorganizmy kak faktor povysheniya zdorov'ya / I. V. Rozhkova, A. V. Begunova // Molochnaya promyshlennost'. 2020. № 7. S. 38–39. https://doi.org/10.31515/1019-8946-2020-06-38-39; https://elibrary.ru/csiwxk

16. Zol'nikova, O. Yu. Mikrobiota kishechnika i probiotiki: ot teorii k praktike / O. Yu. Zol'nikova, M. S. Reshetova, C. Sin'lu // Vrach. 2023. № 2. S. 28–34. https://doi.org/10.29296/25877305-2023-02-06; https://elibrary.ru/gkjemg