Our website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with this notice and the Terms of Use.
Journals KemSU
Scientific journal "Bulletin of KemSU. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences Scientific journal "Bulletin of KemSU. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic sciences Scientific journal "Bulletin of KemSU. Series: Biological, Engineering and Earth Sciences SibScript (until February 17, 2023 – Bulletin of KemSU Strategizing: Theory and Practice Foods and Raw Materials Virtual Communication and Social Networks Food Processing: Techniques and Technology Dairy industry Cheese- and buttermaking Science Evolution
Submit manuscript
Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences
UDC
34
VAK Russia
12.00.03

"SUCCESS FEE": OLD SONG, NEW TUNE "Success Fee": Old Song, New Tune

Published in Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences · Pages 177–185 · Rubric: JURISPRUDENCE
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2020-4-2-177-186
Received: 02.10.2020 Accepted: 02.10.2020 Published: 02.10.2020
Authors
EG Egor Trezubov
Egor Trezubov
ORCID ResearcherID SPIN
MI
Mikhail A. Roze
ABSTRACT
The research featured substantive and procedural peculiarities of contract costing for legal assistance through the so-called "success fee", or contingency fee, from the point of view of various legal approaches. The contract costing for legal services based on contingency fee does not comply with the current Russian law. Therefore, it can be difficult for the lawyer to collect the fee from the customer. Though courts do acknowledge contingency fees, the related business practice remains legally unregulated. The situation did not change in 2013 when the institution of invalidity of legal transactions was reformed in civil law. The issue belongs to the substantive sphere, since the procedural area reveals no peculiarities in reimbursing expenses incurred to pay for the services of a legal representative. The recent innovations of legal regulation on "success fee" are related to the new edition of the Federal Law "On Advocacy and the Legal Profession in the Russian Federation", which entered into force on March 01, 2020. The authors believe that the problem is not the matter of advocacy legislation because it would then contradict with the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, which has priority over other regulations in this case. They criticize the obvious lobbying of legally enforceable precautions to include stipulated remuneration on legal assistance, as well as the substantial restrictions on the rights of private lawyers with no attorneyship.
KEYWORDS
legal fees, payment to a legal service representative, advocacy, agreement on legal assistance, success fee, contingency fee, suspensive condition
Text References
Text
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Popova D. G., Etina T. S. Judicial representation: compared with the civil doctrine. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya "Pravo", 2016, (4): 161-168. (In Russ.)

2. Kratenko M. V. Legal aid contract in modern civil law. Cand. Jurispr. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Tomsk, 2005, 32. (In Russ.)

3. Tretiakova V. P. Rendering paid legal services. Kemerovo: Kemerovskii poligraficheskii kombinat, 2010, 187. (In Russ.)

4. Popova D. G. Participation of the lawyer in protection of the civil and family rights of minors: borders and opportunities. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo, 2019, (31): 180-190. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/31/17

5. Popova D. G. Professional judicial representation: current situation and prospects. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki, 2018, (4): 84-91. (In Russ.)

6. Bagreeva E. G., Petukhov S. V. "Fee of success": legal and ethical nature. Evrazijskaya advokatura, 2019, (6): 23-25. (In Russ.)

7. Khalatov S. A. Success fee as a part of court costs. Supreme Court’s approach case comment on the judgments of RF SC № 309 EC14 3167, 26 February 2015. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiia Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2015, (3): 9-13. (In Russ.)

8. Services: civil law regulation, eds. Sannikova L. V., Sukhanov E. A. Moscow-Berlin: Infotropic Media, 2011, 220. (In Russ.)

9. Vereshagin A. N. "Fee of success" before the constitutional justice. Sravnitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, 2007, (1): 173-178. (In Russ.)

10. Braginskii M. I., Vitrianskii V. V. Contract law. Book 3: Work and service contracts, 2nd ed. Moscow: Statut, 2011, 1053. (In Russ.)

11. Civil law, ed. Sergeev A. P., 2nd ed. Moscow: Prospect, 2019, vol. 1, 1040. (In Russ.)

12. Petrov A. A. The controversial aspects of resolving of normoconflicts in cases of formal priority of codes. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo, 2019, 10(1): 4-23. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.101

13. Ermakova N. S. Success fee: views abroad and in Russia. Legality in modern society: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Orenburg, April 13, 2017. Ufa, 2017, 122-126. (In Russ.)

14. Iakovleva O. New legislation on lawyers and the legal profession. Trudovoe pravo, 2020, (2): 43-45. (In Russ.)

15. Chernyshev G. P. On the "success fee" (on contingent fees). Zakon, 2007, (12): 55-58. (In Russ.)

16. Osokina G. L. Civil procedure. General part, 3rd ed. Moscow: Norma; INFRA-M, 2013, 703. (In Russ.)

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
PDF Text JATS XML
The contact persons
Irina Morozova
Chief editor
Irina Morozova
ishmorozova@yandex.ru
Egor Trezubov
Deputy Editor-in-Chief
Egor Trezubov
egortrezubov@mail.ru
9830
downloads
RINC RINC Science Index Socionet Crossref Cyberleninka Dimensions ERIH PLUS VAK The Lens Directory of Open Access Journals
CC
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Creative Commons
© КемГУ, 1997–2025
Agreement Personal data protection and processing policy Support Powered by Editorum, 2026 Instructions
Login or Create
* Forgot your password?