1. Anikina T. V. Lexical peculiarities of English and Russian Internet advertising. Filologicheskii aspekt, 2020, (12): 41–53. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/fuidhn

2. Akhrenova N. A. Dominants of contemporary internet linguistics. Dr. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Mytishchi, 2018, 49. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pgwdez

3. Akhrenova N. A. Internet-discourse as a hypertext. Bulletin of Moscow Region State University, 2016, (3). (In Russ.) URL: https://www.evestnik-mgou.ru/jour/article/view/1063 (accessed 27 Jan 2026). https://elibrary.ru/xknqhp

4. Akhrenova N. A. Theoretical foundations of Internet linguistics. Philology. Theory & Practice, 2013, (10): 22–26. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rbueyx

5. Beloglazova E. V. Polydiscoursity as special research focus. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta ekonomiki i finansov, 2009, (3): 66–71. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/kxibqv

6. Bogdanova E. A. Means of persuasion in journal discourse. Vestnik of Kostroma State University, 2024, 30(1): 149–156. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2024-30-1-149-156

7. Borisova E. G. Marketing linguistics: Prospects and trends. Verhnevolzhski Philological Bulletin, 2016, (4): 140–143. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xgrexl

8. Volkova T. A. Discourse and communication model as a system of translation strategy determinants. Dr. Philol. Sci. Diss. Nizhny Novgorod, 2022, 467. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ezbwxt

9. Volkova T. A., Zubenina M. A. Pragmatic and sociocultural adaptation in political texts translation. Socio- i psiholingvisticheskie issledovaniya, 2015, (3): 54–66. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vlfggz

10. Volkova T. A., Mitrofanova K. A. Micro- and macrostrategy of translating popular science books. Inostrannye yazyki v vysshei shkole, 2025, (3): 5–14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37724/RSU.2025.74.3.001

11. Kalendr A. A. Media discourse as information reconstruction. Mir nauki, kultury, obrazovaniya, 2016, (5): 326–329. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wxgwnx

12. Karasik V. I. Language circle: Personality, concepts, and discourse. Volgograd: Peremena, 2002, 477. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ugqamp

13. Klushina N. I. Emotiogenicity as a criterion for differentiation of the modern media space. Emotive linguistic ecology in the modern communicative space, eds. Shteba A. A., Volkova P. S., Korobkina N. I. Volgograd: Peremena, 2013, 209–217. (In Russ.)

14. Kozhemyakin E. A. Mass communication and media discourse: Toward a research methodology. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki, 2010, (12): 13–21. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/mtxurn

15. Kornienko E. R. Polydiscursivity as a constant of the linguistic personality abstract. Baltic Humanitarian Journal, 2019, 8(1): 89–92. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zahysl

16. Nelyubin L. L. Explanatory translation dictionary. 3rd ed. Moscow: Flinta, 2003, 318. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qqocsx

17. Pelevina N. N. Discourse interaction in scientific and literary texts. Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena, 2008, (78): 137–143. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jvyxtx

18. Weiste E., Peräkylä A. Therapeutic discourse. The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction, eds. Tracy K., Sandel T., Ilie C. Wiley-Blackwell, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi102

19. Wilce J. M. Medical discourse. Annual Review of Anthropology, 2009, 38: 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164450