1. Barkhudarov L. S. Issues of translating English poetry into Russian. Tetradi perevodchika, 1984, (21): 38–48. (In Russ.)

2. Batyushkina M. V. On the rules of intrasystem adaptation of legislative texts (discursive aspect). Review of Omsk State Pedagogical University. Humanitarian research, 2017, (2): 42–46. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zddcfb

3. Vasilenko T. N. Defining the concept of a nest of related texts in the derivational aspect of research: Original literary text and its translations. Philology and Man, 2015, (3): 110–116. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/utbivp

4. Vorobyova M. E. Functioning of juridical terms in ordinary consciousness of native speakers of Russian. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2011, (3): 174–180. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/okabft

5. Golev N. D., Kim L. G. Dictum-modus pluralism in virtual dialogic discourse (based on Internet comments). Medialingvistika, 2023, 10(1): 4–26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2023.101

6. Golev N. D., Melnikova V. S., Napreenko G. V. The Russian legal text within the "new variantology" paradigm. Siberian Journal of Philology, 2025, (4): 201–215. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nhflou

7. Dudareva Ya. A. Textual synonymy and copyonymy from the perspective of identity – similarity – difference. SibScript, 2025, 27(1): 73–84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2025-27-1-73-84

8. Dyakova A. A. Basic characteristics of functional types of judicial texts adopted to the conditions of media discourse. Lingua mobilis, 2011, (6): 79–86. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tnxikb

9. Ionova S. V. Two models for constructing secondary texts. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 2006, (5): 69–76. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/kuxdrv

10. Kim L. G. "Text length" as a factor of variety and its interpretative functioning. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2017, (49): 38–51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/49/3

11. Kolmogorova A. V. Emotional tonality as a valuable subjective parameter of study text for Russian as foreign language learners. Philological Class, 2019, (3): 95–101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26170/FK19-03-13

12. Kolmogorova A. V., Vdovina L. A. Lexical and grammatical markers of emotions as parameters for sentiment analysis of Internet texts in Russian. Perm University Herald. Russian and Foreign Philology, 2019, 11(3): 38–46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17072/2073-6681-2019-3-38-46

13. Kropachev M. N., Kuznetsov S. A. The state language of the Russian Federation is easy-to-read Russian. World of the Russian Word, 2020, (2): 7–13. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jotdvy

14. Melnik N. V. Derivational interpretation of the different types of secondary texts. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2012, (13): 69–73. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pcwfhn

15. Melnik N. V., Silkova M. A. Subjective modality as a means of legitimizing political decisions in the Internet discourse of regional politicians in Russia and Germany. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 2025, 24(9): 41–53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2025-24-9-41-53

16. Pervukhina S. V. Semantic and syntactic characteristics of adapted text in legal discourse. Philology. Theory & Practice, 2013, (4-22): 136–140. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pxslzh

17. Pervukhina S. V. Characteristic features of adapted legal text. Language and Culture, 2015, (1): 31–37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/19996195/29/4

18. Romanova N. A., Romashova O. V. Derivation of texts of clinical recommendations (guidelines). International Research Journal, 2024, (12). (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ngedqp

19. Ryadovykh N. A. Category of tonality explicated in the texts of virtual genre. Virtual Communication and Social Networks, 2022, 1(4): 203–207. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-4799-2022-1-4-203-207

20. Saveleva I. V. "Naive" legitimization perceived as a political or discourse phenomenon by the recipient of non-professional Internet discourse. Virtual Communication and Social Networks, 2025, 4(3): 279–293. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-4799-2025-4-3-279-293

21. Satuchina T. Yu. Denotation variation degree of linguistic sign: an experimental study of interpretative activity. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2021, 23, (4): 1067–1073. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-4-1067-1073

22. Soloviev V. A. Human-centricity in public administration: Scientific discourse and contemporary Russian practice. Public Administration Issues, 2025, (4): 86–109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2025-0-4-86-109

23. Trofimova N. A., Kovalenko D. D. Preservation of the author’s tonality as a tool for evaluating translation quality. Discourse, 2024, 10(5): 129–140. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2024-10-5-129-140

24. Trubnikova Yu. V. Lexical-derivational structure of the text. Philology and Man, 2011, (1): 16–25. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nyoqmp

25. Shpilnaya N. N. Dialogic concept of textual motivation. Siberian Journal of Philology, 2025, (2): 220–232. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/18137083/91/17