Trebovaniya k stat'yam

• Tekst nabiraetsya bez formatirovaniya i numeracii stranic, s uchetom abzacev i osobyh ukazaniy v trebovaniyah k oformleniyu statey.
• Shrift – Times New Roman, razmer shrifta – 10, mezhstrochnyy interval – 1,0. Ne dopuskaetsya prostavlyat' abzacnyy otstup tabulyaciey ili seriey probelov.
• V redakciyu stat'ya predostavlyaetsya v vide fayla s rasshireniem .doc, .docx, .rtf.
• Zhurnal publikuet tri tipa statey:

• Original'naya stat'ya: ob'em stat'i 15–30 tys. znakov s probelami, 10–30 punktov v literature.
• Obzornaya stat'ya: ob'em stat'i 50–80 tys. znakov s probelami, ot 80 punktov v literature.
• Kratkoe soobschenie, recenziya – do 6 tys. znakov.

• Ob'em stat'i vklyuchaet annotaciyu, klyuchevye slova, podstrochnye ssylki i spisok literatury.
• Nazvanie stat'i, informaciya ob avtore(ah), annotaciya, klyuchevye slova, podpisi k risunkam i tablicam predostavlyayutsya na russkom i angliyskom yazykah.
• Original'nost' stat'i – ne menee 75 %. Ob'em zaimstvovaniya iz odnogo istochnika ne dolzhen prevyshat' 6 %. V tekste ne dopuskayutsya nepravomernye zaimstvovaniya.

Struktura materiala

1. Metadannye na russkom yazyke

Tip rukopisi (original'naya stat'ya / obzornaya stat'ya / kratkoe soobschenie / recenziya).

Nazvanie stat'i

FIO avtorov. Imya i otchestvo pishutsya polnost'yu i ukazyvayutsya posle familii. 

Organizaciya avtora. Neobhodimo ukazat' oficial'noe nazvanie uchrezhdeniya, cherez zapyatuyu napisat' nazvanie goroda, strany.

E-mail avtora, s kotorym sleduet vesti perepisku.

Annotaciya. (150–250 slov) informativnaya (ne soderzhit obschih slov); original'naya; soderzhatel'naya; vklyuchaet vse aspekty soderzhaniya stat'i: predmet, cel' raboty; noviznu i aktual'nost'; metod ili metodologiyu provedeniya raboty; rezul'taty raboty; vyvody.

Klyuchevye slova. 6–10 slov, sposobstvuyuschih indeksirovaniyu stat'i v poiskovyh sistemah.

2. Metadannye na angliyskom yazyke

Tip rukopisi (full article / review / short communication article / book review)

Nazvanie stat'i

Imena avtorov. Imya O. Familiya. Transliteracii FIO avtora dolzhna byt' identichna predstavlennoy v profile ORCID, zagranichnom pasporte ili tak zhe, kak v ranee opublikovannyh stat'yah. 

Organizaciya avtora. Oficial'noe angloyazychnoe nazvanie uchrezhdeniya.

E-mail avtora, s kotorym sleduet vesti perepisku.

Annotaciya. Angloyazychnaya versiya annotacii dolzhna polnost'yu sootvetstvovat' russkoyazychnoy i byt' gramotnoy s tochki zreniya angliyskogo yazyka.

Klyuchevye slova. Klyuchevye slova na angliyskom yazyke sootvetstvuyut ih poryadku v russkoy versii medannyh.

3. Polnyy tekst rukopisi

• Polnyy tekst dolzhen byt' strukturirovan po strukture IMRAD, razdel Rezul'taty mozhet byt' dopolnitel'no razdelen na ozaglavlennye smyslovye chasti.

• Vvedenie: opisyvaetsya obschaya tema issledovaniya, celi raboty, aktual'nost', kratkiy obzor nauchnoy literatury po teme.
• Metody i materialy: opisanie materialov i metodov issledovaniya, opisanie provedennogo analiza original'nogo eksperimental'nogo issledovaniya; ili Teoreticheskie osnovy – esli stat'ya posvyaschena teoreticheskomu issledovaniyu;
• Rezul'taty: predstavleny eksperimental'nye ili teoreticheskie dannye, poluchennye v hode issledovaniya. Rezul'taty dayutsya v obrabotannom variante i mogut byt' predstavleny kak v vide teksta, tak i v vide tablic, grafikov, diagramm, uravneniy, fotografiy, risunkov. Vozmozhny podrazdely, imeyuschie soderzhatel'nye nazvaniya.
  • Primery iz materiala issledovaniya (yazykovye edinicy, citaty iz hudozhestvennyh proizvedeniy) v tekste stat'i dayutsya kursivom bez kavychek.
• Obsuzhdenie: interpretaciya poluchenyh rezul'tatov, ih sootnesenie s drugimi issledovaniyami.
• Zaklyuchenie: soderzhit glavnye idei osnovnogo teksta stat'i; sravnenie poluchennyh rezul'tatov s temi, kotorye planirovalos' poluchit', a takzhe ih novizna i prakticheskaya znachimost'; vyvody i rekomendacii; osnovnye napravleniya dal'neyshih issledovaniy v dannoy oblasti.

• Naglyadnyy material. Risunki i tablicy dolzhny byt' adekvatny stat'e i tekstu, ne dolzhny dublirovat' polnost'yu tekst, ne byt' izbytochnymi ili lishnimi. Oni prednaznacheny dlya chetkogo, polnogo i strukturirovannogo predstavleniya informacii.

• Vse vidy ob'ektov (tablicy, grafiki, diagrammy, risunki, shemy, chertezhi) i podpisi k nim pomeschayutsya v tekst stat'i i numeruyutsya, esli ih chislo bolee odnogo.
• Ssylki na ob'ekty v tekste obyazatel'ny.
• Zagolovok ob'ekta privoditsya na russkom i angliyskom yazykah. 
• Grafiki, diagrammy, shemy, chertezhi, risovannye sredstvami MS Office, predostavlyayutsya otdel'nymi faylami v formate ishodnyh prilozheniy (.xls, .vsd, .doc).
• Nerisovannye ob'ekty (otskanirovannye risunki, fotografii) predostavlyayutsya otdel'nymi faylami v graficheskih formatah (tif, jpg, png ili .pdf) s razresheniem >300 dpi.
• Tablicy predostavlyayutsya kak redaktiruemyy tekst, a ne kak izobrazheniya.

• Podstrochnye snoski. V nih pomeschayutsya ssylki na neopublikovannye raboty ili ne imeyuschie avtorstva (ssylki na normativnye i arhivnye dokumenty, internet-istochniki bez avtorstva, forumy i t. p.), na gosudarstvennye dokumenty (postanovleniya pravitel'stva, zakony i t. d.), istoricheskie dokumenty, gazetnye stat'i, internet-istochniki bez avtorstva (forumy, blogi, video-resursy, prezentacii i t. p.), primery, hudozhestvennye proizvedeniya, istochniki publicisticheskogo i spravochnogo haraktera, a takzhe primechaniya avtora.
• Dopolnitel'naya informaciya

• Konflikt interesov – avtory obyazany soobschit' o lyubyh imeyuschihsya ili potencial'nyh konfliktah interesov, kotorye mogut okazat' vliyanie na reshenie o publikacii ih raboty. Esli konflikt interesov otsutstvuet, sleduet ukazat': Avtor(y) zayavil(i) ob otsutstvii potencial'nyh konfliktov interesov v otnoshenii issledovaniya, avtorstva i / ili publikacii dannoy stat'i. Lyubye raznoglasiya po voprosam avtorskogo vklada, finansirovaniya ili lichnyh otnosheniy, kotorye mogut okazat' vliyanie na predstavlennuyu rabotu, neobhodimo reshit' do podachi rukopisi. Vyyavlennoe redakciey sokrytie potencial'nyh ili yavnyh konfliktov interesov so storony avtorov mozhet stat' prichinoy zaderzhki ili otkaza v rassmotrenii i publikacii rukopisi.
• Kriterii avtorstva – ukazyvaetsya fakticheskiy vklad kazhdogo soavtora v vypolnennuyu rabotu, konkretiziruetsya, na kakom iz etapov sozdaniya stat'i prinimal uchastie kazhdyy iz ee avtorov. Dlya opisaniya nauchnogo vklada issledovateley mozhno vospol'zovat'sya taksonomiey roley uchastnikov CRediT.
• Blagodarnosti – avtory mogut vyrazit' blagodarnosti lyudyam i organizaciyam, kotorye pomogali pri rabote nad issledovaniem i pospobstvovali publikacii stat'i, no ne yavlyayutsya ee avtorami. Razdel ne yavlyaetsya obyazatel'nym.
• Informaciya o finansirovanii – avtory dolzhny ukazat' istochniki finansirovaniya kak nauchnoy raboty, tak i processa publikacii stat'i (fond, kommercheskaya ili gosudarstvennaya organizaciya, chastnoe lico i dr. pri nalichii takovyh): cokrytie informacii o finansirovanii yavlyaetsya odnoy iz prichin konflikta interesov.

• Spisok literatury. Literatura k nauchnoy stat'e – ee obyazatel'naya strukturnaya chast', kotoraya otrazhaet nauchnuyu sostavlyayuschuyu osvescheniya temy i pozvolyaet ubedit'sya v dostovernosti ispol'zuemyh v issledovanii dannyh. Kachestvo spiska literatury pokazyvaet kompetentnost' avtora. Spisok literatury pozvolyaet priznavat' i ispol'zovat' idei drugih avtorov, isklyuchaya obvineniya v plagiate, a takzhe demonstrirovat' masshtab i glubinu issledovaniya cherez citirovanie rabot drugih avtorov i svoih predyduschih publikaciy. Ssylki na noveyshuyu literaturu i na inostrannuyu mogut harakterizovat' aktual'nost' nauchnoy publikacii.

• Rukopisi bez spiska literatury k rassmotreniyu ne prinimayutsya. 
• V spisok literatury vklyuchayutsya tol'ko istochniki, ispol'zovannye pri podgotovke stat'i.
• Kolichestvo istochnikov dlya original'noy nauchnoy stat'i – 10–30, dlya obzornoy ot 80.
• Na vse istochniki v tekste dolzhny byt' dany ssylki.
• V tekste stat'i ssylki oformlyayutsya v kvadratnyh skobkah s ukazaniem avtora, avtorov (esli ih dva), avtora i dr. (esli ih 3 i bolee), goda izdaniya i citirovannyh stranic. Raznye istochniki razdelyayutsya tochkoy s zapyatoy, vnutri odnogo bloka vystraivayutsya po alfavitu. Pri ukazanii diapazona stranic ispol'zuetsya tire (ne defis).
  Napr imer: [Ivanov 2010: 78], [Ivanov, Petrov 2015: 403], [Sidorov i dr. 2020: 7–8], [Ivanov 2010: 78; Ivanov, Petrov 2015: 403; Sidorov i dr. 2020: 7–8].
• Esli v literature odin i tot zhe avtor s tem zhe godom publikacii ispol'zuetsya dvazhdy ili bolee raz, to pri ssylke v tekste u goda ukazyvaetsya: 2010a, 2010b, 2010v.
• Spisok literatury raspolagaetsya posle teksta stat'i v alfavitnom poryadke (snachala istochniki na russkom yazyke, zatem na inostrannyh), predvaryaetsya slovom Literatura / References.
• Ne stoit zloupotreblyat' vklyucheniem dissertaciy (tak kak eto neopublikovannye dokumenty), uchebnyh i metodicheskih posobiy, tak kak oni imeyut vpolne konkretnye obrazovatel'nye celi i nosyat kompilyativnyy harakter. Vmesto ssylok na dissertacii i avtoreferaty sleduet ukazat' stat'i iz nauchnyh zhurnalov, materialov konferenciy, monografii i t. d., opublikovannye kak do, tak i posle publikacii dissertacii dannogo avtora.
• V spiske literatury dolzhny prisutstvovat' istochniki, izdannye za poslednie 5 let (7–10 punktov).
• Samocitirovanie sleduet ogranichit' 10 % ssylok ot obschego kolichestva istochnikov, ono dolzhno byt' obosnovannym.
• Opisanie istochnikov oformlyaetsya v sootvetstvii s GOST 7.05-2008 «Bibliograficheskaya ssylka. Obschie trebovaniya i pravila sostavleniya». Opisanie na latinice oformlyaetsya na osnove stilya Chicago style citation. Znaki punktuacii «//», «/», «–», predpisannye GOST, ne ispol'zuyutsya, ih nadlezhit zamenit' na zapyatye i tochki.
• Bibliograficheskoe opisanie publikacii vklyuchaet:
  • familiyu i inicialy avtorov (vseh, nezavisimo ot ih chisla),
  • polnoe nazvanie raboty,
  • izdanie (esli ukazano),
  • gorod, nazvanie izdatel'stva, god izdaniya,
  • tom (dlya mnogotomnyh izdaniy), nomer, vypusk (dlya periodicheskih izdaniy),
  • dlya statey – nomera pervoy i posledney stranic; dlya monografiy – ob'em publikacii.
• Pri nalichii u istochnikov DOI – ukazyvat' obyazatel'no.
• Pri ssylke na sostavnuyu chast' knigi ili sbornika (stat'yu, glavu, razdel i t. p.) v spiske literatury obyazatel'no ukazyvayutsya ee nachal'naya i konechnaya stranicy.
• Posle russkogo opisaniya v kvadratnyh skobkah daetsya perevod ili transliteraciya istochnika.
• Familii russkih avtorov privodyatsya tak, kak oni sebya propisyvayut v publikaciyah (zarubezhnyh) ili v svoih profilyah (ORCID, Scopus). Esli takoy informacii net, to ispol'zuetsya transliteraciya po standartu BSI (British Standart Institution).
• Imena zarubezhnyh avtorov ne transliteriruyutsya, ih sleduet privodit v originale (naprimer, Dzh. Ostin – v originale J. Austen, a  ne Dzh. Ostin).
• Nazvaniya publikaciy ne v latinskom alfavite perevodyatsya na angliyskiy yazyk. Dlya stat'i na russkom yazyke, v metadannyh kotoroy daetsya perevod nazvaniya na angliyskiy yazyk, neobhodimo ispol'zovat' imenno avtorskiy variant perevoda, a ne perevodit' zanovo. Dannuyu informaciyu mozhno posmotret' na sayte konkretnogo zhurnala ili v NEB eLIBRARY.RU.
• Nazvaniya zhurnalov ne v latinskom alfavite privodyatsya tak, kak oni prosyat sebya citirovat'. Esli takoy informacii zhurnal ne predstavil, to ispol'zuyte transliteraciyu po standartu BSI. Nazvanie zhurnala sleduet vydelit' kursivom.
• Esli tekst istochnika ne na latinice, to v konce opisaniya v kruglyh skobkah ukazyvaetsya yazyk publikacii, naprimer (In Russ.), (In  Jap.), (In Ukr.) i t. d.

Avtorskie prava

Avtory, publikuyuschie stat'i v dannom zhurnale, soglashayutsya na sleduyuschee:

1. Avtory sohranyayut za soboy avtorskie prava i predostavlyayut zhurnalu pravo pervoy publikacii raboty na usloviyah Creative Commons Attribution License i pozvolyayut drugim rasprostranyat' dannuyu rabotu s obyazatel'nym sohraneniem ssylok na avtorov original'noy raboty i original'nuyu publikaciyu v etom zhurnale.
2. Avtory sohranyayut pravo zaklyuchat' otdel'nye kontraktnye dogovorennosti, kasayuschiesya neeksklyuzivnogo rasprostraneniya versii raboty v opublikovannom zdes' vide (naprimer, razmeschenie ee v institutskom hranilische, publikaciya v knige), so ssylkoy na ee original'nuyu publikaciyu v etom zhurnale.
3. Avtory imeyut pravo razmeschat' ih rabotu v seti Internet (naprimer, v institutskom hranilische ili personal'nom sayte) do i vo vremya processa rassmotreniya ee dannym zhurnalom, tak kak eto mozhet privesti k produktivnomu obsuzhdeniyu i bol'shemu kolichestvu ssylok na dannuyu rabotu.

Obrazec oformleniya stat'i

original'naya stat'ya
Feykovye novosti v social'nyh setyah: faktor adresata
Petr Petrovich Petrov
Kemerovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, Kemerovo, Rossiya
https://orcid.org/hhhh-hhhh-hhhh-hhhh
petrov@mail.ru

Sidor Sidorovich Sidorov
Ivanovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, Ivanovo, Rossiya
https://orcid.org/hhhh-hhhh-hhhh-hhhh

Annotaciya:
Klyuchevye slova:

full article
Fake News on social Media: the Addressee Factor
Peter P. Petrov
Kemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
https://orcid.org/hhhh-hhhh-hhhh-hhhh
petrov@mail.ru

Sidor S. Sidorov
Ivanovo State University, Ivanovo, Russian Federation
https://orcid.org/hhhh-hhhh-hhhh-hhhh

Abstract: This paper proposes……
Keywords:

Tekst stat'i

Konflikt interesov: Avtory zayavili ob otsutstvii potencial'nyh konfliktov interesov v otnoshenii issledovaniya, avtorstva i / ili publikacii dannoy stat'i.
Conflict of interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.
Kriterii avtorstva: 
Contribution:
Finansirovanie: Issledovanie vypolneno pri podderzhke…
Funding: The work is...
Blagodarnosti:
Acknowledgements:

Literatura / References

Publication ethics

The Journal Virtual Communication and Social Networks is guided by the principles of publication ethics based on the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the Publishing Ethics Resource Kit (Elsevier), and the Decree on Ethical Principles of Scientific Publications issued by the Association of Science Editors and Publishers.

All those involved in the publishing process (the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the editorial office) are to observe the abovementioned codes of publication ethics.

1. Duties of the Publisher

• The policy of the Journal is based on respect for the individual rights of the author and intellectual property rights.

• The publisher ensures independent and conscientious consideration of all submitted manuscripts, without prejudice against ethnic, religious, or social status of their authors and regardless of commercial interests and relations with the founder.

• The publisher shall work to ensure and improve the quality of published materials and meet the needs of readers and authors to make a significant contribution to the development studies of virtual communication and social networks.

• Our editorial principles involve relevance, importance, clarity, reliability, and validity of the published research material. Credibility, reproducibility, uniqueness, fullness, balance, and transparency are the main indicators of quality of the publications.

• The publisher strives to attract and recruit highly qualified professionals who can contribute to the development of the Journal.

• The publisher shall constantly improve the processes of reviewing and editing.

• The publisher shall guarantee that all submitted manuscripts are checked for image manipulation, plagiarism, and duplicate or redundant publications.

• The publisher shall take all necessary measures in case of conflict and publish improvements, clarifications, refutations, and apologies if necessary.

2. Duties of the Editorial office

• The editorial office publishes information for authors, including the formatting requirements, submission and review procedures.

• The editorial office ensures independent and conscientious consideration of all submitted manuscripts, without prejudice against ethnic, religious, or social status of their authors and regardless of any commercial interests and relations with the publisher.

• The editorial office has the right to reject a badly written manuscript that does not meet the formatting requirements or contains evidence of slander, plagiarism, or copyright infringement. The final decision on the publication of an article or refusal of such is taken by the editor-in-chief and is fair and unprejudiced.

• Manuscripts submitted to the editorial office are checked for borrowings from open sources (plagiarism). The check is carried out through the Internet resources (www.antiplagiat.ru and https://crosscheck.ithenticate.com). Should multiple unauthorized borrowings be detected, the editorial office follows the COPE algorithm.

• The editorial office ensures confidentiality, which means that the submitted manuscript cannot be demonstrated to anyone other than the respective authors, reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher.

• The editorial office ensures that the materials of the rejected manuscript will not be used in the board members’ own research without the written consent of the author.

• The editorial office shall promptly examine each complaint about any possible unethical behavior of the authors of submitted and published articles and undertake appropriate measures. Should the unethical behaviour be proved, the editorial office has the right to refuse to publish the article, cease further cooperation with the author, publish a retraction, or take other necessary measures to further curb unethical behavior of the author in question.

• Should an error be detected, amendments shall be provided as soon as possible. When the online version of the article is corrected, it is provided with the correction date and a reference to the errata published.

3.Duties of Authors

• Authors guarantee that the manuscript they submit meets the formatting requirements.

• Authors guarantee that the submitted manuscript contains authentic results that have never been published and are not being reviewed by other journals.

• Deliberately erroneous or forged data and conclusions are unacceptable.

• Authors are free to post the initial draft of their manuscript on such public preprint servers as bioRxiv, arXiv, or in the related repository. In this case they should inform the Journal about it and provide a link to the preprint. However, they cannot post their article on preprint servers if it has already been published by the Journal or improved to meet the requirements of the editorial board or reviewers, as it might be regarded as a duplicate publication. When citing an article published in the Journal, please make sure that the link leads to the official page of the article on the Journal's website.

• Authors are required to refer to other studies as correctly and accurately as possible by specifying the original source in the references. A word-for-word citation or periphrasis of the author’s own publications is unacceptable: they can only be used as a basis for new findings.

• Authors must follow the applicable laws on copyright protection. Materials protected by copyright, e.g. tables, figures, or large citations, may be reproduced only with the permission of their respective owners.

• Authors cannot copy references from other publications if they are not familiar with the original source. Quotes and references must be accurate and formatted in accordance with the requirements.

• Authors ensure that the list of authors includes only those individuals who have made significant contributions to the work, and that no researcher deserving authorship has been excluded from the list of authors.

• In determining the authorship and contributorship, the editorial office follows the CRediT authorship criteria.

1. Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND.

2. Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND

3. Final approval of the version to be published; AND

4. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

• All those designated as authors should meet all four criteria for authorship, and all who meet the four criteria should be identified as authors. Those who do not meet all four criteria should be acknowledged. These authorship criteria are intended to reserve the status of authorship for those who deserve credit and can take responsibility for the work.

• The corresponding author shall guarantee that all the co-authors have seen the final version of the manuscript, approved it, and agreed to its submission for publication in the Journal.

• Authors must disclose any conflicts of interests that could affect the evaluation and interpretation of their manuscript.

• The sources of financial support for the project (grants, state programs, projects, etc.) are to be indicated in the manuscript.

• Authors are required to immediately notify the editorial office in the event of an error in any work filed by them for publication, accepted for publication, or already published, and contribute to its correction. Should the editorial office be informed about an error by third parties, the authors are to promptly correct the error or justify it.

• Authors retain exclusive rights to the published material, which is marked with Copyright © on the title page of the Journal.

• All papers published in the Journal fall under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC BY 4.0). The online version of the Journal is published in open assess, which means that you are free to read, download, copy, forward, print, and make reference to the complete texts provided you mention the author’s name. 

4. Duties of the Editor-in-Chief

• The editor-in-chief promotes the Journal, improves the quality of published materials, meets the needs of readers and authors, and contributes to the development studies of virtual communication and social networks.

• The editor-in-chief uses the following criteria to accept a manuscript for publication: compliance with the profile of the Journal; relevance, novelty, and significance; clarity of presentation; reliability of results and completeness of conclusions. The decision is based on all the comments provided by independent reviewers. The main criteria are the quality of research and its relevance.

• The editor-in-chief (in his absence – deputy editor-in-chief) shall guarantee an independent and conscientious consideration of all manuscripts without ethnic, religious, or social prejudice and regardless of any commercial interests or relations with the founder or publisher.

• Manuscripts are private property of their authors and cannot be subject to disclosure. They cannot be used for personal purposes or transferred to third parties without the written consent of the author.

• The editor-in-chief (in his absence – deputy editor-in-chief) has the right to reject the publication with evidence of slander, insult, plagiarism, or copyright infringement.

• The editor-in-chief (in his absence – deputy editor-in-chief) selects independent experienced reviewers with no conflict of interest.

• The editor-in-chief (in his absence – deputy editor-in-chief) shall decide on the acceptance or rejection of an article for publication on the basis of all the comments provided by independent reviewers. The final editorial decision and the reasons for its adoption are reported to the authors. The editorial office shall take all necessary measures in case of conflict.

5. Duties of Reviewers

• The expert evaluation of the manuscript promotes the adoption of editorial decisions and also helps the author improve the manuscript. Based on the reviews, the editor-in-chief (in his absence – deputy editor-in-chief) makes a decision to accept the manuscript for publication, return it to the author for revision, or reject it.

• To be published, a manuscript has to be recommended by two independent reviewers appointed by the editor-in-chief (in his absence – deputy editor-in-chief). The double blind peer review can be conducted by the members of the editorial board or by acknowledged academic experts (doctors, professors) in the area of research who have had recent publications on the related topic.

• Reviewing is strictly confidential. A breach of confidentiality is unacceptable unless the reviewer reports unreliability or counterfeiting of the material.

• Reviewers guarantee a confidential, independent, honest, and objective review of all manuscripts. The reviewer has the right to reject a manuscript before the review stage if it has been found to be of poor quality or does not meet the requirements of the Journal. This decision is made fairly and impartially.

• Reviewers shall provide a review within the time specified by the editors or notify the editor if the deadline is impossible.

• Reviewers shall provide an objective peer review. All the conclusions of the reviewer should be strictly provided with links to authoritative sources. Personal criticism of author by the reviewer is unacceptable. In such cases, the Editors follow the COPE protocole.

• Should the reviewer detect that the manuscript was based on other studies which the author failed to mention in the references, the reviewer shall inform the editor about it. Reviewers are obliged to inform the editor about any resemblance or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and other previously published research.

• Reviewers have no right to use unpublished manuscript materials in their own research without the written consent of the author.

• Reviewers cannot examine the manuscript if they find themselves unqualified or biased, or in case a conflict of interests arises because of competitive, cooperative, or other relationship with the author or organization related to the manuscript.

• If the reviewer raises an issue of data accuracy or the rationale for publication, the author is given an opportunity to respond.

• Independent peer reviewers are informed about the requirements or any changes in the editorial policy.

• The editorial office shall not reveal any personal data concerning the reviewers.

6. Correction policy

• The editorial office allows its authors to correct mistakes, typographical errors, or other inaccuracies after their manuscript has been published.

• Should you find an error, misprint, or any other inaccuracy in your published article, do not hesitate to inform the Editors.

• The Editorial Board is ready to make the following types of correction:

  • Addendum is published in case some important information, data, or results were unintentionally omitted from the article, i.e. author's affiliation, grant number, funding, research subject or method, etc. The Addendum is an Appendix to the published article, which informs about the missing information. The Addendum is published in the printed and digital versions of the current issue with the article number added. The original article is not changed, but acquires a hyperlink to the Addendum.

  • Erratum is a correction of formatting or other unscientific change to something that causes ambiguity, hinders understanding or prevents correct citing, e.g. spelling or factual error in the title or author's name, affiliation, e-mail, etc., missing or fuzzy figures, missing or misspelled words; a typo in the formula or in its explanation, etc. The Erratum is made in the digital version, and a message about the Erratum is published on the website and in the current printed issue. Minor errors that do not hinder the meaning or understanding are not corrected, and no Erratum is published.

  • Corrections are changes that may affect the scientific interpretation, e.g. incorrect data, extra text, wrong information in equations, conclusions, etc. These changes are evaluated by the Reviewer, and the final decision on making Corrections belongs to the Chief-in-Editor. The Corrections are published in the current issue as a separate publication with a reference to the original article. The original article is not modified, but acquires a hyperlink to the Correction.

7. Retraction

• Retraction of a published article is considered to be the last resort in case previously unknown facts were revealed after the review stage. In this case, the editorial office follows the COPE algorithm and the Decree issued by the Association of Science Editors and Publishers.

• Retraction can be initiated by authors, readers, reviewers, editors, and other publishers by appealing to the editorial office.

8. Violations

• Should the publication ethics be violated by the publisher, editorial office, the editor-in-chief, reviewers, or authors, an investigation is required. This applies to both published and unpublished materials.

1. General
   • We accept manuscripts of original articles and reviews in Russian and English.
   • The authors guarantee that:
     • they own the exclusive copyright for the manuscript they submit;
     • they publication will not infringe a third party’s copyright;
     • the manuscript has never been published;
     • they did not submit it to any other journal;
     • the list of authors includes only those who contributed to the research.
     • they agree with the Publication Ethics, and Rules of the Journal.
2. Submission procedure
   • E-mail us your manuscript and additional materials or upload them as separate files using your personal account on our website.
   • If you previously submitted this article to some other journal but it was not accepted for publication, please inform us in your letter lest we should accidentally reject your manuscript after the initial check-up.
   • Please remember that the Editors do not enter into correspondence with Authors to discuss the content, methods, or formatting of the articles submitted. Neither do we improve the scientific and methodological quality of the paper. 
3. Registration and Initial Check-Up
   • The registration and initial check-up stage normally take five days. We will e-mail you about the current status of your manuscript. If you did not get a letter from us within five days, it means that we did not receive your submission due to some technical problem. Please send your letter again or call +7(3842)55-87-61.
   • The Editor checks all submitted manuscripts for compliance with the profile of The Journal, Publishing Ethics (plagiarism, doubling, etc.), and formatting requirements (text volume, structure, number of keywords, abstract volume, references, in-text references, information about the Authors, etc.)
   • If your article is beyond the scope of the Journal or violates our Publishing Ethics, you will receive a substantiated rejection letter.
   • If the submitted article does not meet our formatting requirements, it will be returned to you for revision and improvement. 
   • Should you fail to e-mail us the improved version within 10 days, your next attempt will automatically be classified as a new submission.
   • Please visit our website to find out more about formatting requirements.
4. If the manuscript passes the initial check-up, it will be peer-reviewed by two experts in accordance with the rules established by the Editorial. The review process is double-blind to provide anonymity for both authors and reviewers.
   • The reviewer is appointed by the editor-in-chief or the deputy editors.
   • All manuscripts that have passed the initial selection stage are subject to a mandatory double-blind peer review conducted by the members of the Editorial Board or by acknowledged academic specialists in the related area with at least three years of publishing experience.
   • The journal only publishes the manuscripts recommended by the reviewers.
5. Admission Procedure
   • After your manuscript has been approved for publication, the Editor will inform you by e-mail and state the approximate publication date.
   • We do not guarantee that your manuscript will be published in the next issue: the review procedure usually takes some time.
   • We can provide you with an official letter that your manuscript has been accepted for publication. Do not hesitate to request a confirmation letter, if needed.
   • A publishing license agreement is signed by the Author(s) after the article is recommended for publication.
   • Papers are published depending on the registration date and editorial plans. Articles on topical issues and break-through research can be published out of turn by the decision of the Editor-in-Chief.
6. Editing and Publishing
   • All manuscripts are published only after they undergo literary editing and proofreading.
   • All changes made by the Editor require your consent by e-mail.
   • You will receive the typeset article for final approval before publication.
   • All articles have a printed and online version.

The journal only publishes the manuscripts recommended by the reviewers.

«Double-blind» peer review.

The reviewer is appointed by the editor-in-chief or the deputy editor. Both the members of the editorial board and highly qualified scientists and specialists from other organizations and enterprises can be invited for reviewing manuscripts.

They have to have profound professional knowledge and experience of work in the specific field of science and be doctors of sciences and professors.

The reviewers are notified about the manuscripts being the authors' private owner rights and not being subject to public disclosure. The reviewers are not allowed to copy the articles for their private needs. Reviewing is performed confidentially. Violation of confidentiality is impossible unless the reviewer declares unreliability or counterfeiting of the article's materials.

The term for the article consideration should not exceed three months from the date of starting the reviewing process.

If the reviewer points out, that improvement is necessary the article is sent to the author for follow-on revision. In this case the return date of the modified article is considered the date of the article submission.

If, on the recommendation of the reviewer, the article underwent a considerable revision by the author, it is again sent to the reviewer who gave the critical remarks. The editorial board reserves the right to reject the articles in case of the author's inability or unwillingness to take into account the editor's recommendations.

In case of two negative manuscript reviews from different experts or one negative review on the article's modified variant it is rejected without considering by other members of the editorial board. After reviewing the possibility of publication is decided upon by the editor-in-chief or, in case of necessity, by the editorial board altogether.

The author of the rejected article is sent a motivated refusal by the official responsible for issuing. The reviewer's name may be reported to the author provided that the former gives consent to it.

Reviews' originals are kept by the editorial board during five years since the publication.

1. Retraction purpose.
   1. The Editors can retract a published article to inform the readers that the article contains faulty / unreliable data.
   2. The Editors can retract a published article to inform the readers about plagiarisms, an unreported conflict of interests, or doubling, i.e. if new information has been revealed that can affect the interpretation of the published data or recommendations on their use.
2. An article can be retracted if the Editors found out that the article violates the ethics of scientific publishing.
   1. if the article contains invalid data, be it the result of a deliberate violation, miscalculation, experimental error, or misprint;
   2. the Author(s) published one and the same data or manuscript in several journals without a serious reason, authorization, or cross-reference;
   3. the bulk of the article was copied from a previously published work by a different author.
3. Retraction Procedure
   1. Retraction can be initiated by Authors, Readers, Reviewers, Editors, and other Publishers by officially appealing to the Editorial Board. An expertise conducted by the Editorial Board can also trigger a retraction procedure.
   2. If the Editorial Board failed to answer a retraction claim from the author within 10 days, the author is free to appeal to the Association of Science Editors and Publishers (ASEP).
   3. If the Editorial Board decides to retract the article based on the violations mentioned above, the Corresponding Author is sent a notification that explains the reasons for the retraction.
   4. The final decision takes into account the explanation given by the Author. Should the author fail to respond within 10 days, the Editors are free to retract the publication without the Author’s concern. Irrespective of the fact whether the Authors accept the standpoint of the editorial board or not, the retraction is an abiding procedure.
   5. The retraction protocol is sent to the corresponding author, the ASEP, eLIBRARY.RU, and CyberLeninka.
   6. A retraction note, which states its reason and date, is published both in the paper and online versions of the Journal. After that, the article will be marked as RETRACTED in all reference databases. Retracted articles are excluded from all citation indices and reference lists and do not affect electronic calculations of one’s personal scientific achievements.
   7. After the retraction procedure has been completed, the Editorial Board retains the right not to accept other manuscripts submitted by the author(s) in question for a certain period.

Subscription indices: E79882 – in the online-store of periodicals "Press by subscription".

To purchase individual issues of the printed version, please contact us at jsocnet@mail.ru or call +7(3842)55-87-61.

The paid-off issues may be collected at the Editorial Office: Kemerovo State University, Office 149, Bld.2, 73, Sovetskii Ave, Kemerovo, Kemerovo region (Kuzbass), 650000, Russia.

How you can subscribing and pay for the issue

Pay online

Virtual'naya kommunikaciya i social'nye seti — nacional'nyy nauchnyy recenziruemyy zhurnal.

Missiya — podderzhivat' vysokiy nauchnyy uroven' diskussii o sostoyanii virtual'noy kommunikativistiki, ee metodologii i problematiki; osveschat' mezhdisciplinarnye osobennosti diskursa social'nyh setey, sociologii i psihologii ih uchastnikov, vovlekaya v etot process naibolee kvalificirovannyh ekspertov — issledovateley i praktikov; donosit' nauchnoe znanie o fenomene virtual'noy kommunikacii i social'nyh setey kak do teoretikov-specialistov, tak i do shirokoy obschestvennosti — zhurnalistov, pedagogov, psihologov, sociologov.

Zhurnal yavlyaetsya ploschadkoy dlya obmena vsestoronnimi mneniyami po voprosam virtual'nyh kommunikaciy i social'nyh setey.

Cel' deyatel'nosti zhurnala — osveschenie, sohranenie i rasprostranenie rezul'tatov noveyshih nauchnyh issledovaniy v oblasti filologii, sociologii, psihologii i mezhdisciplinarnyh issledovaniy yazyka.

Zadachi:

1) integrirovanie osnovnyh tendenciy i dostizheniy sovremennyh nauchnyh issledovaniy, ustanovlenie i ukreplenie nauchnyh svyazey mirovogo nauchnogo soobschestva;
2) znakomstvo chitatelya s osnovnymi napravleniyami issledovaniy sibirskih, rossiyskih uchenyh i uchenyh stran SNG (filologov, psihologov i sociologov), osveschenie filologicheskoy i sociologo-psihologicheskoy nauchnoy zhizni (konferencii, seminary, publikacii);
3) adekvatnoe otrazhenie sostoyaniya virtual'noy kommunikativistiki, ee metodologii i problematiki, mezhdisciplinarnoe osveschenie osobennostey yazyka, social'nyh setey, sociologii i psihologii ih uchastnikov.

Mezhdisciplinarnost' izdaniya raskryvaetsya v original'nyh i obzornyh stat'yah, recenziyah, posvyaschennyh obscheteoreticheskim problemam virtual'noy kommunikacii, funkcionirovaniyu yazykovyh sredstv v sfere internet-obscheniya, tipologii kommunikativnyh praktik, diskursov i rechevyh zhanrov, specifike kul'turno-rechevoy, mental'no-psihologicheskoy i social'noy situacii v virtual'nom prostranstve Rossii i mira. 

Elektronnaya kommunikativistika — novoe i perspektivnoe nauchnoe napravlenie, posvyaschennoe mezhdisciplinarnomu izucheniyu virtual'nogo obscheniya, yadernyy komponent kotorogo sostavlyayut social'nye seti.

Kontent zhurnala — konceptual'nye raboty po klyuchevym voprosam virtual'noy kommunikacii, analiticheskie materialy o rezul'tatah konkretnyh issledovaniy v sfere virtual'noy kommunikativistiki, stat'i, otrazhayuschie vzaimodeystvie filologicheskih, psihologicheskih, sociologicheskih i kognitivnyh nauk v oblasti issledovaniya virtual'noy kommunikacii.

V zhurnale publikuyutsya nauchnye i obzornye stat'i, recenzii, kratkie nauchnye soobscheniya na russkom, angliyskom yazykah, a takzhe informacionnye i novostnye materialy, posvyaschennye obscheteoreticheskim problemam funkcionirovaniya yazykovyh sredstv v internet-kommunikacii, tipologii zhanrov, specifike kul'turno-rechevoy, mental'noy i social'noy situacii v virtual'nom prostranstve Rossii i mira.

Tematicheskie napravleniya:

• Filosofskoe: social'nye seti kak novyy fenomen kommunikacii i formiruemogo im obschestvennogo soznaniya; chelovek v social'nyh setyah — novyy tip cheloveka, novaya etika, novaya kul'tura, novaya psihologiya i biologiya; cifrovoe bessmertie cheloveka.
• Kognitivnoe: elektronnyy i biologicheskiy mozg; problema izomorfizma v ustroystve i funkcionirovanii social'nyh setey i neyronnyh setey.
• Social'no-politologicheskoe: social'naya tipologiya i portretirovanie uchastnikov social'nyh setey; social'nye seti kak otrazhenie social'nogo rassloeniya obschestva: problema kommunikacii pokolencheskih stratov obschestva; molodezhnyy strat kak sistemnyy ob'ekt issledovaniya.
• Psihologicheskoe: psihologicheskaya tipologiya i portretirovanie uchastnikov social'nyh setey; social'nye seti kak faktor formirovaniya psihologicheskih ustanovok; internet-zavisimost' detey, podrostkov i yunoshey ot social'nyh setey kak problema sovremennosti.
• Lingvisticheskoe: vliyanie virtual'noy kommunikacii i social'nyh setey na russkuyu rech' i russkiy yazyk; diskursivnye praktiki v social'nyh setyah; lingvopersonologiya social'nyh setey; lingvokonfliktologiya social'nyh setey.
• Yuridicheskoe: social'nye seti kak sreda i sredstvo pravonarusheniy; instrument bor'by s pravonarusheniyami.
• Lingvopedagogicheskoe: social'nye seti: drug i / ili vrag rossiyskoy shkoly, roditeley i obschestva; formirovanie kul'tury obscheniya v social'nyh setyah.
• Lingvoyuridicheskoe: vyyavlenie v social'nyh setyah tekstov, soderzhaschih priznaki pravonarusheniy; lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza rechevyh proizvedeniy — produkta setevoy kommunikacii.
• Mediakommunikativnoe: mesto social'nyh setey v mediynom prostranstve sovremennogo obschestva; transnacional'nye i intranacional'nye tendencii.

Celevaya auditoriya zhurnala – filologi, psihologi i sociologi, issledovaniya kotoryh orientirovany na izuchenie fenomena virtual'noy kommunikacii i social'nyh setey.

Zhurnal publikuet stat'i po sleduyuschim gruppam nauchnyh special'nostey:

5.4. Sociologiya
5.4.4. Social'naya struktura, social'nye instituty i processy
5.4.7. Sociologiya upravleniya
5.9. Filologiya
5.9.5. Russkiy yazyk. Yazyki narodov Rossii
5.9.8. Teoreticheskaya, prikladnaya i sravnitel'no-sopostavitel'naya lingvistika
5.9.9. Mediakommunikaciya i zhurnalistika (filologicheskie, sociologicheskie)
5.12 Kognitivnye nauki
5.12.3. Mezhdisciplinarnye issledovaniya yazyka (filosofskie, psihologicheskie, filologicheskie).

Vse nauchnye stat'i, postupivshie v redakciyu zhurnala, prohodyat obyazatel'noe recenzirovanie — dvustoronnee slepoe. V kachestve recenzentov privlekayutsya kak chleny redakcionnoy kollegii zhurnala, tak i vysokokvalificirovannye uchenye i specialisty drugih organizaciy, obladayuschie glubokimi professional'nymi znaniyami i opytom raboty po konkretnomu nauchnomu napravleniyu i imeyuschie opyt publikacionnoy deyatel'nosti po tematike recenziruemyh statey ne menee treh let.

Redakciya zhurnala pri rassmotrenii stat'i proizvodit proverku materiala s pomosch'yu sistemy Antiplagiat. V sluchae obnaruzheniya mnogochislennyh zaimstvovaniy redakciya deystvuet v sootvetstvii s pravilami Komiteta po etike nauchnyh publikaciy (COPE — Committee on Publication Ethics) i etikoy zhurnala.

Zhurnal ne vzimaet platu za podachu, recenzirovanie, predpechatnuyu podgotovku i izdanie rukopisey. Finansirovanie zhurnala osuschestvlyaetsya za schet sredstv uchreditelya — FGBOU VO «Kemerovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet».

Zhurnal «Virtual'naya kommunikaciya i social'nye seti» yavlyaetsya zhurnalom otkrytogo dostupa (Open Access). Priderzhivaetsya principa: svobodnyy otkrytyy dostup k rezul'tatam issledovaniy sposobstvuet uvelicheniyu global'nogo obmena znaniyami (Budapest Open Access Initiative). 

Materialy, opublikovannye v zhurnale «Virtual'naya kommunikaciya i social'nye seti», rasprostranyayutsya na usloviyah licenzii Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

Zhurnal uchrezhden v 2022 godu.

Zaregistrirovan v Federal'noy sluzhbe po nadzoru v sfere svyazi, informacionnyh tehnologiy i massovyh kommunikaciy, svidetel'stvo o registracii: EL № FS 77-82963. 

Mezhdunarodnye standartnye seriynye nomera zhurnala (ISSN) — 2782-4799 (print); 2782-4802 (online).

Vyhodit 4 raza v god.

Adres uchreditelya, izdatelya: Kemerovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet; Rossiya, Kemerovskaya oblast', 650000, g. Kemerovo, ul. Krasnaya, 6; 8(3842)58-12-26; restor@kemsu.ru

Adres redakcii: Rossiya, Kemerovskaya oblast', 650000, g. Kemerovo, ul. Krasnaya, 6, of. 4109;
 +7(3842)55-87-61, jsocnet@mail.ru

Kontakty dlya sotrudnichestva:
Golev Nikolay Danilovich, d-r filol. nauk, prof., glavnyy redaktor, ngolevd@mail.ru
Kim Lidiya Gustovna, d-r filol. nauk, docent, zamestitel' glavnogo redaktora, kimli09@mail.ru

Rabota redakcii realizovana na platforme «Editorum».

16+

Trebovaniya k stat'yam

• Tekst nabiraetsya bez formatirovaniya i numeracii stranic, s uchetom abzacev i osobyh ukazaniy v trebovaniyah k oformleniyu statey.
• Shrift – Times New Roman, razmer shrifta – 10, mezhstrochnyy interval – 1,0. Ne dopuskaetsya prostavlyat' abzacnyy otstup tabulyaciey ili seriey probelov.
• V redakciyu stat'ya predostavlyaetsya v vide fayla s rasshireniem .doc, .docx, .rtf.
• Zhurnal publikuet tri tipa statey:

• Original'naya stat'ya: ob'em stat'i 15–30 tys. znakov s probelami, 10–30 punktov v literature.
• Obzornaya stat'ya: ob'em stat'i 50–80 tys. znakov s probelami, ot 80 punktov v literature.
• Kratkoe soobschenie, recenziya – do 6 tys. znakov.

• Ob'em stat'i vklyuchaet annotaciyu, klyuchevye slova, podstrochnye ssylki i spisok literatury.
• Nazvanie stat'i, informaciya ob avtore(ah), annotaciya, klyuchevye slova, podpisi k risunkam i tablicam predostavlyayutsya na russkom i angliyskom yazykah.
• Original'nost' stat'i – ne menee 75 %. Ob'em zaimstvovaniya iz odnogo istochnika ne dolzhen prevyshat' 6 %. V tekste ne dopuskayutsya nepravomernye zaimstvovaniya.

Struktura materiala

1. Metadannye na russkom yazyke

Tip rukopisi (original'naya stat'ya / obzornaya stat'ya / kratkoe soobschenie / recenziya).

Nazvanie stat'i

FIO avtorov. Imya i otchestvo pishutsya polnost'yu i ukazyvayutsya posle familii. 

Organizaciya avtora. Neobhodimo ukazat' oficial'noe nazvanie uchrezhdeniya, cherez zapyatuyu napisat' nazvanie goroda, strany.

E-mail avtora, s kotorym sleduet vesti perepisku.

Annotaciya. (150–250 slov) informativnaya (ne soderzhit obschih slov); original'naya; soderzhatel'naya; vklyuchaet vse aspekty soderzhaniya stat'i: predmet, cel' raboty; noviznu i aktual'nost'; metod ili metodologiyu provedeniya raboty; rezul'taty raboty; vyvody.

Klyuchevye slova. 6–10 slov, sposobstvuyuschih indeksirovaniyu stat'i v poiskovyh sistemah.

2. Metadannye na angliyskom yazyke

Tip rukopisi (full article / review / short communication article / book review)

Nazvanie stat'i

Imena avtorov. Imya O. Familiya. Transliteracii FIO avtora dolzhna byt' identichna predstavlennoy v profile ORCID, zagranichnom pasporte ili tak zhe, kak v ranee opublikovannyh stat'yah. 

Organizaciya avtora. Oficial'noe angloyazychnoe nazvanie uchrezhdeniya.

E-mail avtora, s kotorym sleduet vesti perepisku.

Annotaciya. Angloyazychnaya versiya annotacii dolzhna polnost'yu sootvetstvovat' russkoyazychnoy i byt' gramotnoy s tochki zreniya angliyskogo yazyka.

Klyuchevye slova. Klyuchevye slova na angliyskom yazyke sootvetstvuyut ih poryadku v russkoy versii medannyh.

3. Polnyy tekst rukopisi

• Polnyy tekst dolzhen byt' strukturirovan po strukture IMRAD, razdel Rezul'taty mozhet byt' dopolnitel'no razdelen na ozaglavlennye smyslovye chasti.

• Vvedenie: opisyvaetsya obschaya tema issledovaniya, celi raboty, aktual'nost', kratkiy obzor nauchnoy literatury po teme.
• Metody i materialy: opisanie materialov i metodov issledovaniya, opisanie provedennogo analiza original'nogo eksperimental'nogo issledovaniya; ili Teoreticheskie osnovy – esli stat'ya posvyaschena teoreticheskomu issledovaniyu;
• Rezul'taty: predstavleny eksperimental'nye ili teoreticheskie dannye, poluchennye v hode issledovaniya. Rezul'taty dayutsya v obrabotannom variante i mogut byt' predstavleny kak v vide teksta, tak i v vide tablic, grafikov, diagramm, uravneniy, fotografiy, risunkov. Vozmozhny podrazdely, imeyuschie soderzhatel'nye nazvaniya.
  • Primery iz materiala issledovaniya (yazykovye edinicy, citaty iz hudozhestvennyh proizvedeniy) v tekste stat'i dayutsya kursivom bez kavychek.
• Obsuzhdenie: interpretaciya poluchenyh rezul'tatov, ih sootnesenie s drugimi issledovaniyami.
• Zaklyuchenie: soderzhit glavnye idei osnovnogo teksta stat'i; sravnenie poluchennyh rezul'tatov s temi, kotorye planirovalos' poluchit', a takzhe ih novizna i prakticheskaya znachimost'; vyvody i rekomendacii; osnovnye napravleniya dal'neyshih issledovaniy v dannoy oblasti.

• Naglyadnyy material. Risunki i tablicy dolzhny byt' adekvatny stat'e i tekstu, ne dolzhny dublirovat' polnost'yu tekst, ne byt' izbytochnymi ili lishnimi. Oni prednaznacheny dlya chetkogo, polnogo i strukturirovannogo predstavleniya informacii.

• Vse vidy ob'ektov (tablicy, grafiki, diagrammy, risunki, shemy, chertezhi) i podpisi k nim pomeschayutsya v tekst stat'i i numeruyutsya, esli ih chislo bolee odnogo.
• Ssylki na ob'ekty v tekste obyazatel'ny.
• Zagolovok ob'ekta privoditsya na russkom i angliyskom yazykah. 
• Grafiki, diagrammy, shemy, chertezhi, risovannye sredstvami MS Office, predostavlyayutsya otdel'nymi faylami v formate ishodnyh prilozheniy (.xls, .vsd, .doc).
• Nerisovannye ob'ekty (otskanirovannye risunki, fotografii) predostavlyayutsya otdel'nymi faylami v graficheskih formatah (tif, jpg, png ili .pdf) s razresheniem >300 dpi.
• Tablicy predostavlyayutsya kak redaktiruemyy tekst, a ne kak izobrazheniya.

• Podstrochnye snoski. V nih pomeschayutsya ssylki na neopublikovannye raboty ili ne imeyuschie avtorstva (ssylki na normativnye i arhivnye dokumenty, internet-istochniki bez avtorstva, forumy i t. p.), na gosudarstvennye dokumenty (postanovleniya pravitel'stva, zakony i t. d.), istoricheskie dokumenty, gazetnye stat'i, internet-istochniki bez avtorstva (forumy, blogi, video-resursy, prezentacii i t. p.), primery, hudozhestvennye proizvedeniya, istochniki publicisticheskogo i spravochnogo haraktera, a takzhe primechaniya avtora.
• Dopolnitel'naya informaciya

• Konflikt interesov – avtory obyazany soobschit' o lyubyh imeyuschihsya ili potencial'nyh konfliktah interesov, kotorye mogut okazat' vliyanie na reshenie o publikacii ih raboty. Esli konflikt interesov otsutstvuet, sleduet ukazat': Avtor(y) zayavil(i) ob otsutstvii potencial'nyh konfliktov interesov v otnoshenii issledovaniya, avtorstva i / ili publikacii dannoy stat'i. Lyubye raznoglasiya po voprosam avtorskogo vklada, finansirovaniya ili lichnyh otnosheniy, kotorye mogut okazat' vliyanie na predstavlennuyu rabotu, neobhodimo reshit' do podachi rukopisi. Vyyavlennoe redakciey sokrytie potencial'nyh ili yavnyh konfliktov interesov so storony avtorov mozhet stat' prichinoy zaderzhki ili otkaza v rassmotrenii i publikacii rukopisi.
• Kriterii avtorstva – ukazyvaetsya fakticheskiy vklad kazhdogo soavtora v vypolnennuyu rabotu, konkretiziruetsya, na kakom iz etapov sozdaniya stat'i prinimal uchastie kazhdyy iz ee avtorov. Dlya opisaniya nauchnogo vklada issledovateley mozhno vospol'zovat'sya taksonomiey roley uchastnikov CRediT.
• Blagodarnosti – avtory mogut vyrazit' blagodarnosti lyudyam i organizaciyam, kotorye pomogali pri rabote nad issledovaniem i pospobstvovali publikacii stat'i, no ne yavlyayutsya ee avtorami. Razdel ne yavlyaetsya obyazatel'nym.
• Informaciya o finansirovanii – avtory dolzhny ukazat' istochniki finansirovaniya kak nauchnoy raboty, tak i processa publikacii stat'i (fond, kommercheskaya ili gosudarstvennaya organizaciya, chastnoe lico i dr. pri nalichii takovyh): cokrytie informacii o finansirovanii yavlyaetsya odnoy iz prichin konflikta interesov.

• Spisok literatury. Literatura k nauchnoy stat'e – ee obyazatel'naya strukturnaya chast', kotoraya otrazhaet nauchnuyu sostavlyayuschuyu osvescheniya temy i pozvolyaet ubedit'sya v dostovernosti ispol'zuemyh v issledovanii dannyh. Kachestvo spiska literatury pokazyvaet kompetentnost' avtora. Spisok literatury pozvolyaet priznavat' i ispol'zovat' idei drugih avtorov, isklyuchaya obvineniya v plagiate, a takzhe demonstrirovat' masshtab i glubinu issledovaniya cherez citirovanie rabot drugih avtorov i svoih predyduschih publikaciy. Ssylki na noveyshuyu literaturu i na inostrannuyu mogut harakterizovat' aktual'nost' nauchnoy publikacii.

• Rukopisi bez spiska literatury k rassmotreniyu ne prinimayutsya. 
• V spisok literatury vklyuchayutsya tol'ko istochniki, ispol'zovannye pri podgotovke stat'i.
• Kolichestvo istochnikov dlya original'noy nauchnoy stat'i – 10–30, dlya obzornoy ot 80.
• Na vse istochniki v tekste dolzhny byt' dany ssylki.
• V tekste stat'i ssylki oformlyayutsya v kvadratnyh skobkah s ukazaniem avtora, avtorov (esli ih dva), avtora i dr. (esli ih 3 i bolee), goda izdaniya i citirovannyh stranic. Raznye istochniki razdelyayutsya tochkoy s zapyatoy, vnutri odnogo bloka vystraivayutsya po alfavitu. Pri ukazanii diapazona stranic ispol'zuetsya tire (ne defis).
  Napr imer: [Ivanov 2010: 78], [Ivanov, Petrov 2015: 403], [Sidorov i dr. 2020: 7–8], [Ivanov 2010: 78; Ivanov, Petrov 2015: 403; Sidorov i dr. 2020: 7–8].
• Esli v literature odin i tot zhe avtor s tem zhe godom publikacii ispol'zuetsya dvazhdy ili bolee raz, to pri ssylke v tekste u goda ukazyvaetsya: 2010a, 2010b, 2010v.
• Spisok literatury raspolagaetsya posle teksta stat'i v alfavitnom poryadke (snachala istochniki na russkom yazyke, zatem na inostrannyh), predvaryaetsya slovom Literatura / References.
• Ne stoit zloupotreblyat' vklyucheniem dissertaciy (tak kak eto neopublikovannye dokumenty), uchebnyh i metodicheskih posobiy, tak kak oni imeyut vpolne konkretnye obrazovatel'nye celi i nosyat kompilyativnyy harakter. Vmesto ssylok na dissertacii i avtoreferaty sleduet ukazat' stat'i iz nauchnyh zhurnalov, materialov konferenciy, monografii i t. d., opublikovannye kak do, tak i posle publikacii dissertacii dannogo avtora.
• V spiske literatury dolzhny prisutstvovat' istochniki, izdannye za poslednie 5 let (7–10 punktov).
• Samocitirovanie sleduet ogranichit' 10 % ssylok ot obschego kolichestva istochnikov, ono dolzhno byt' obosnovannym.
• Opisanie istochnikov oformlyaetsya v sootvetstvii s GOST 7.05-2008 «Bibliograficheskaya ssylka. Obschie trebovaniya i pravila sostavleniya». Opisanie na latinice oformlyaetsya na osnove stilya Chicago style citation. Znaki punktuacii «//», «/», «–», predpisannye GOST, ne ispol'zuyutsya, ih nadlezhit zamenit' na zapyatye i tochki.
• Bibliograficheskoe opisanie publikacii vklyuchaet:
  • familiyu i inicialy avtorov (vseh, nezavisimo ot ih chisla),
  • polnoe nazvanie raboty,
  • izdanie (esli ukazano),
  • gorod, nazvanie izdatel'stva, god izdaniya,
  • tom (dlya mnogotomnyh izdaniy), nomer, vypusk (dlya periodicheskih izdaniy),
  • dlya statey – nomera pervoy i posledney stranic; dlya monografiy – ob'em publikacii.
• Pri nalichii u istochnikov DOI – ukazyvat' obyazatel'no.
• Pri ssylke na sostavnuyu chast' knigi ili sbornika (stat'yu, glavu, razdel i t. p.) v spiske literatury obyazatel'no ukazyvayutsya ee nachal'naya i konechnaya stranicy.
• Posle russkogo opisaniya v kvadratnyh skobkah daetsya perevod ili transliteraciya istochnika.
• Familii russkih avtorov privodyatsya tak, kak oni sebya propisyvayut v publikaciyah (zarubezhnyh) ili v svoih profilyah (ORCID, Scopus). Esli takoy informacii net, to ispol'zuetsya transliteraciya po standartu BSI (British Standart Institution).
• Imena zarubezhnyh avtorov ne transliteriruyutsya, ih sleduet privodit v originale (naprimer, Dzh. Ostin – v originale J. Austen, a  ne Dzh. Ostin).
• Nazvaniya publikaciy ne v latinskom alfavite perevodyatsya na angliyskiy yazyk. Dlya stat'i na russkom yazyke, v metadannyh kotoroy daetsya perevod nazvaniya na angliyskiy yazyk, neobhodimo ispol'zovat' imenno avtorskiy variant perevoda, a ne perevodit' zanovo. Dannuyu informaciyu mozhno posmotret' na sayte konkretnogo zhurnala ili v NEB eLIBRARY.RU.
• Nazvaniya zhurnalov ne v latinskom alfavite privodyatsya tak, kak oni prosyat sebya citirovat'. Esli takoy informacii zhurnal ne predstavil, to ispol'zuyte transliteraciyu po standartu BSI. Nazvanie zhurnala sleduet vydelit' kursivom.
• Esli tekst istochnika ne na latinice, to v konce opisaniya v kruglyh skobkah ukazyvaetsya yazyk publikacii, naprimer (In Russ.), (In  Jap.), (In Ukr.) i t. d.

Avtorskie prava

Avtory, publikuyuschie stat'i v dannom zhurnale, soglashayutsya na sleduyuschee:

1. Avtory sohranyayut za soboy avtorskie prava i predostavlyayut zhurnalu pravo pervoy publikacii raboty na usloviyah Creative Commons Attribution License i pozvolyayut drugim rasprostranyat' dannuyu rabotu s obyazatel'nym sohraneniem ssylok na avtorov original'noy raboty i original'nuyu publikaciyu v etom zhurnale.
2. Avtory sohranyayut pravo zaklyuchat' otdel'nye kontraktnye dogovorennosti, kasayuschiesya neeksklyuzivnogo rasprostraneniya versii raboty v opublikovannom zdes' vide (naprimer, razmeschenie ee v institutskom hranilische, publikaciya v knige), so ssylkoy na ee original'nuyu publikaciyu v etom zhurnale.
3. Avtory imeyut pravo razmeschat' ih rabotu v seti Internet (naprimer, v institutskom hranilische ili personal'nom sayte) do i vo vremya processa rassmotreniya ee dannym zhurnalom, tak kak eto mozhet privesti k produktivnomu obsuzhdeniyu i bol'shemu kolichestvu ssylok na dannuyu rabotu.

Obrazec oformleniya stat'i

original'naya stat'ya
Feykovye novosti v social'nyh setyah: faktor adresata
Petr Petrovich Petrov
Kemerovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, Kemerovo, Rossiya
https://orcid.org/hhhh-hhhh-hhhh-hhhh
petrov@mail.ru

Sidor Sidorovich Sidorov
Ivanovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, Ivanovo, Rossiya
https://orcid.org/hhhh-hhhh-hhhh-hhhh

Annotaciya:
Klyuchevye slova:

full article
Fake News on social Media: the Addressee Factor
Peter P. Petrov
Kemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
https://orcid.org/hhhh-hhhh-hhhh-hhhh
petrov@mail.ru

Sidor S. Sidorov
Ivanovo State University, Ivanovo, Russian Federation
https://orcid.org/hhhh-hhhh-hhhh-hhhh

Abstract: This paper proposes……
Keywords:

Tekst stat'i

Konflikt interesov: Avtory zayavili ob otsutstvii potencial'nyh konfliktov interesov v otnoshenii issledovaniya, avtorstva i / ili publikacii dannoy stat'i.
Conflict of interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.
Kriterii avtorstva: 
Contribution:
Finansirovanie: Issledovanie vypolneno pri podderzhke…
Funding: The work is...
Blagodarnosti:
Acknowledgements:

Literatura / References

Publication ethics

The Journal Virtual Communication and Social Networks is guided by the principles of publication ethics based on the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the Publishing Ethics Resource Kit (Elsevier), and the Decree on Ethical Principles of Scientific Publications issued by the Association of Science Editors and Publishers.

All those involved in the publishing process (the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the editorial office) are to observe the abovementioned codes of publication ethics.

1. Duties of the Publisher

• The policy of the Journal is based on respect for the individual rights of the author and intellectual property rights.

• The publisher ensures independent and conscientious consideration of all submitted manuscripts, without prejudice against ethnic, religious, or social status of their authors and regardless of commercial interests and relations with the founder.

• The publisher shall work to ensure and improve the quality of published materials and meet the needs of readers and authors to make a significant contribution to the development studies of virtual communication and social networks.

• Our editorial principles involve relevance, importance, clarity, reliability, and validity of the published research material. Credibility, reproducibility, uniqueness, fullness, balance, and transparency are the main indicators of quality of the publications.

• The publisher strives to attract and recruit highly qualified professionals who can contribute to the development of the Journal.

• The publisher shall constantly improve the processes of reviewing and editing.

• The publisher shall guarantee that all submitted manuscripts are checked for image manipulation, plagiarism, and duplicate or redundant publications.

• The publisher shall take all necessary measures in case of conflict and publish improvements, clarifications, refutations, and apologies if necessary.

2. Duties of the Editorial office

• The editorial office publishes information for authors, including the formatting requirements, submission and review procedures.

• The editorial office ensures independent and conscientious consideration of all submitted manuscripts, without prejudice against ethnic, religious, or social status of their authors and regardless of any commercial interests and relations with the publisher.

• The editorial office has the right to reject a badly written manuscript that does not meet the formatting requirements or contains evidence of slander, plagiarism, or copyright infringement. The final decision on the publication of an article or refusal of such is taken by the editor-in-chief and is fair and unprejudiced.

• Manuscripts submitted to the editorial office are checked for borrowings from open sources (plagiarism). The check is carried out through the Internet resources (www.antiplagiat.ru and https://crosscheck.ithenticate.com). Should multiple unauthorized borrowings be detected, the editorial office follows the COPE algorithm.

• The editorial office ensures confidentiality, which means that the submitted manuscript cannot be demonstrated to anyone other than the respective authors, reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher.

• The editorial office ensures that the materials of the rejected manuscript will not be used in the board members’ own research without the written consent of the author.

• The editorial office shall promptly examine each complaint about any possible unethical behavior of the authors of submitted and published articles and undertake appropriate measures. Should the unethical behaviour be proved, the editorial office has the right to refuse to publish the article, cease further cooperation with the author, publish a retraction, or take other necessary measures to further curb unethical behavior of the author in question.

• Should an error be detected, amendments shall be provided as soon as possible. When the online version of the article is corrected, it is provided with the correction date and a reference to the errata published.

3.Duties of Authors

• Authors guarantee that the manuscript they submit meets the formatting requirements.

• Authors guarantee that the submitted manuscript contains authentic results that have never been published and are not being reviewed by other journals.

• Deliberately erroneous or forged data and conclusions are unacceptable.

• Authors are free to post the initial draft of their manuscript on such public preprint servers as bioRxiv, arXiv, or in the related repository. In this case they should inform the Journal about it and provide a link to the preprint. However, they cannot post their article on preprint servers if it has already been published by the Journal or improved to meet the requirements of the editorial board or reviewers, as it might be regarded as a duplicate publication. When citing an article published in the Journal, please make sure that the link leads to the official page of the article on the Journal's website.

• Authors are required to refer to other studies as correctly and accurately as possible by specifying the original source in the references. A word-for-word citation or periphrasis of the author’s own publications is unacceptable: they can only be used as a basis for new findings.

• Authors must follow the applicable laws on copyright protection. Materials protected by copyright, e.g. tables, figures, or large citations, may be reproduced only with the permission of their respective owners.

• Authors cannot copy references from other publications if they are not familiar with the original source. Quotes and references must be accurate and formatted in accordance with the requirements.

• Authors ensure that the list of authors includes only those individuals who have made significant contributions to the work, and that no researcher deserving authorship has been excluded from the list of authors.

• In determining the authorship and contributorship, the editorial office follows the CRediT authorship criteria.

1. Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND.

2. Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND

3. Final approval of the version to be published; AND

4. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

• All those designated as authors should meet all four criteria for authorship, and all who meet the four criteria should be identified as authors. Those who do not meet all four criteria should be acknowledged. These authorship criteria are intended to reserve the status of authorship for those who deserve credit and can take responsibility for the work.

• The corresponding author shall guarantee that all the co-authors have seen the final version of the manuscript, approved it, and agreed to its submission for publication in the Journal.

• Authors must disclose any conflicts of interests that could affect the evaluation and interpretation of their manuscript.

• The sources of financial support for the project (grants, state programs, projects, etc.) are to be indicated in the manuscript.

• Authors are required to immediately notify the editorial office in the event of an error in any work filed by them for publication, accepted for publication, or already published, and contribute to its correction. Should the editorial office be informed about an error by third parties, the authors are to promptly correct the error or justify it.

• Authors retain exclusive rights to the published material, which is marked with Copyright © on the title page of the Journal.

• All papers published in the Journal fall under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC BY 4.0). The online version of the Journal is published in open assess, which means that you are free to read, download, copy, forward, print, and make reference to the complete texts provided you mention the author’s name. 

4. Duties of the Editor-in-Chief

• The editor-in-chief promotes the Journal, improves the quality of published materials, meets the needs of readers and authors, and contributes to the development studies of virtual communication and social networks.

• The editor-in-chief uses the following criteria to accept a manuscript for publication: compliance with the profile of the Journal; relevance, novelty, and significance; clarity of presentation; reliability of results and completeness of conclusions. The decision is based on all the comments provided by independent reviewers. The main criteria are the quality of research and its relevance.

• The editor-in-chief (in his absence – deputy editor-in-chief) shall guarantee an independent and conscientious consideration of all manuscripts without ethnic, religious, or social prejudice and regardless of any commercial interests or relations with the founder or publisher.

• Manuscripts are private property of their authors and cannot be subject to disclosure. They cannot be used for personal purposes or transferred to third parties without the written consent of the author.

• The editor-in-chief (in his absence – deputy editor-in-chief) has the right to reject the publication with evidence of slander, insult, plagiarism, or copyright infringement.

• The editor-in-chief (in his absence – deputy editor-in-chief) selects independent experienced reviewers with no conflict of interest.

• The editor-in-chief (in his absence – deputy editor-in-chief) shall decide on the acceptance or rejection of an article for publication on the basis of all the comments provided by independent reviewers. The final editorial decision and the reasons for its adoption are reported to the authors. The editorial office shall take all necessary measures in case of conflict.

5. Duties of Reviewers

• The expert evaluation of the manuscript promotes the adoption of editorial decisions and also helps the author improve the manuscript. Based on the reviews, the editor-in-chief (in his absence – deputy editor-in-chief) makes a decision to accept the manuscript for publication, return it to the author for revision, or reject it.

• To be published, a manuscript has to be recommended by two independent reviewers appointed by the editor-in-chief (in his absence – deputy editor-in-chief). The double blind peer review can be conducted by the members of the editorial board or by acknowledged academic experts (doctors, professors) in the area of research who have had recent publications on the related topic.

• Reviewing is strictly confidential. A breach of confidentiality is unacceptable unless the reviewer reports unreliability or counterfeiting of the material.

• Reviewers guarantee a confidential, independent, honest, and objective review of all manuscripts. The reviewer has the right to reject a manuscript before the review stage if it has been found to be of poor quality or does not meet the requirements of the Journal. This decision is made fairly and impartially.

• Reviewers shall provide a review within the time specified by the editors or notify the editor if the deadline is impossible.

• Reviewers shall provide an objective peer review. All the conclusions of the reviewer should be strictly provided with links to authoritative sources. Personal criticism of author by the reviewer is unacceptable. In such cases, the Editors follow the COPE protocole.

• Should the reviewer detect that the manuscript was based on other studies which the author failed to mention in the references, the reviewer shall inform the editor about it. Reviewers are obliged to inform the editor about any resemblance or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and other previously published research.

• Reviewers have no right to use unpublished manuscript materials in their own research without the written consent of the author.

• Reviewers cannot examine the manuscript if they find themselves unqualified or biased, or in case a conflict of interests arises because of competitive, cooperative, or other relationship with the author or organization related to the manuscript.

• If the reviewer raises an issue of data accuracy or the rationale for publication, the author is given an opportunity to respond.

• Independent peer reviewers are informed about the requirements or any changes in the editorial policy.

• The editorial office shall not reveal any personal data concerning the reviewers.

6. Correction policy

• The editorial office allows its authors to correct mistakes, typographical errors, or other inaccuracies after their manuscript has been published.

• Should you find an error, misprint, or any other inaccuracy in your published article, do not hesitate to inform the Editors.

• The Editorial Board is ready to make the following types of correction:

  • Addendum is published in case some important information, data, or results were unintentionally omitted from the article, i.e. author's affiliation, grant number, funding, research subject or method, etc. The Addendum is an Appendix to the published article, which informs about the missing information. The Addendum is published in the printed and digital versions of the current issue with the article number added. The original article is not changed, but acquires a hyperlink to the Addendum.

  • Erratum is a correction of formatting or other unscientific change to something that causes ambiguity, hinders understanding or prevents correct citing, e.g. spelling or factual error in the title or author's name, affiliation, e-mail, etc., missing or fuzzy figures, missing or misspelled words; a typo in the formula or in its explanation, etc. The Erratum is made in the digital version, and a message about the Erratum is published on the website and in the current printed issue. Minor errors that do not hinder the meaning or understanding are not corrected, and no Erratum is published.

  • Corrections are changes that may affect the scientific interpretation, e.g. incorrect data, extra text, wrong information in equations, conclusions, etc. These changes are evaluated by the Reviewer, and the final decision on making Corrections belongs to the Chief-in-Editor. The Corrections are published in the current issue as a separate publication with a reference to the original article. The original article is not modified, but acquires a hyperlink to the Correction.

7. Retraction

• Retraction of a published article is considered to be the last resort in case previously unknown facts were revealed after the review stage. In this case, the editorial office follows the COPE algorithm and the Decree issued by the Association of Science Editors and Publishers.

• Retraction can be initiated by authors, readers, reviewers, editors, and other publishers by appealing to the editorial office.

8. Violations

• Should the publication ethics be violated by the publisher, editorial office, the editor-in-chief, reviewers, or authors, an investigation is required. This applies to both published and unpublished materials.

1. General
   • We accept manuscripts of original articles and reviews in Russian and English.
   • The authors guarantee that:
     • they own the exclusive copyright for the manuscript they submit;
     • they publication will not infringe a third party’s copyright;
     • the manuscript has never been published;
     • they did not submit it to any other journal;
     • the list of authors includes only those who contributed to the research.
     • they agree with the Publication Ethics, and Rules of the Journal.
2. Submission procedure
   • E-mail us your manuscript and additional materials or upload them as separate files using your personal account on our website.
   • If you previously submitted this article to some other journal but it was not accepted for publication, please inform us in your letter lest we should accidentally reject your manuscript after the initial check-up.
   • Please remember that the Editors do not enter into correspondence with Authors to discuss the content, methods, or formatting of the articles submitted. Neither do we improve the scientific and methodological quality of the paper. 
3. Registration and Initial Check-Up
   • The registration and initial check-up stage normally take five days. We will e-mail you about the current status of your manuscript. If you did not get a letter from us within five days, it means that we did not receive your submission due to some technical problem. Please send your letter again or call +7(3842)55-87-61.
   • The Editor checks all submitted manuscripts for compliance with the profile of The Journal, Publishing Ethics (plagiarism, doubling, etc.), and formatting requirements (text volume, structure, number of keywords, abstract volume, references, in-text references, information about the Authors, etc.)
   • If your article is beyond the scope of the Journal or violates our Publishing Ethics, you will receive a substantiated rejection letter.
   • If the submitted article does not meet our formatting requirements, it will be returned to you for revision and improvement. 
   • Should you fail to e-mail us the improved version within 10 days, your next attempt will automatically be classified as a new submission.
   • Please visit our website to find out more about formatting requirements.
4. If the manuscript passes the initial check-up, it will be peer-reviewed by two experts in accordance with the rules established by the Editorial. The review process is double-blind to provide anonymity for both authors and reviewers.
   • The reviewer is appointed by the editor-in-chief or the deputy editors.
   • All manuscripts that have passed the initial selection stage are subject to a mandatory double-blind peer review conducted by the members of the Editorial Board or by acknowledged academic specialists in the related area with at least three years of publishing experience.
   • The journal only publishes the manuscripts recommended by the reviewers.
5. Admission Procedure
   • After your manuscript has been approved for publication, the Editor will inform you by e-mail and state the approximate publication date.
   • We do not guarantee that your manuscript will be published in the next issue: the review procedure usually takes some time.
   • We can provide you with an official letter that your manuscript has been accepted for publication. Do not hesitate to request a confirmation letter, if needed.
   • A publishing license agreement is signed by the Author(s) after the article is recommended for publication.
   • Papers are published depending on the registration date and editorial plans. Articles on topical issues and break-through research can be published out of turn by the decision of the Editor-in-Chief.
6. Editing and Publishing
   • All manuscripts are published only after they undergo literary editing and proofreading.
   • All changes made by the Editor require your consent by e-mail.
   • You will receive the typeset article for final approval before publication.
   • All articles have a printed and online version.

The Journal "Virtual communication and social networks" is open access journal fully funded by Kemerovo State University. The Journal is committed to ensuring that all of the articles we publish are freely available. Articles are available to all without change, and there are no article processing charges for authors.

The journal only publishes the manuscripts recommended by the reviewers.

«Double-blind» peer review.

The reviewer is appointed by the editor-in-chief or the deputy editor. Both the members of the editorial board and highly qualified scientists and specialists from other organizations and enterprises can be invited for reviewing manuscripts.

They have to have profound professional knowledge and experience of work in the specific field of science and be doctors of sciences and professors.

The reviewers are notified about the manuscripts being the authors' private owner rights and not being subject to public disclosure. The reviewers are not allowed to copy the articles for their private needs. Reviewing is performed confidentially. Violation of confidentiality is impossible unless the reviewer declares unreliability or counterfeiting of the article's materials.

The term for the article consideration should not exceed three months from the date of starting the reviewing process.

If the reviewer points out, that improvement is necessary the article is sent to the author for follow-on revision. In this case the return date of the modified article is considered the date of the article submission.

If, on the recommendation of the reviewer, the article underwent a considerable revision by the author, it is again sent to the reviewer who gave the critical remarks. The editorial board reserves the right to reject the articles in case of the author's inability or unwillingness to take into account the editor's recommendations.

In case of two negative manuscript reviews from different experts or one negative review on the article's modified variant it is rejected without considering by other members of the editorial board. After reviewing the possibility of publication is decided upon by the editor-in-chief or, in case of necessity, by the editorial board altogether.

The author of the rejected article is sent a motivated refusal by the official responsible for issuing. The reviewer's name may be reported to the author provided that the former gives consent to it.

Reviews' originals are kept by the editorial board during five years since the publication.

1. Retraction purpose.
   1. The Editors can retract a published article to inform the readers that the article contains faulty / unreliable data.
   2. The Editors can retract a published article to inform the readers about plagiarisms, an unreported conflict of interests, or doubling, i.e. if new information has been revealed that can affect the interpretation of the published data or recommendations on their use.
2. An article can be retracted if the Editors found out that the article violates the ethics of scientific publishing.
   1. if the article contains invalid data, be it the result of a deliberate violation, miscalculation, experimental error, or misprint;
   2. the Author(s) published one and the same data or manuscript in several journals without a serious reason, authorization, or cross-reference;
   3. the bulk of the article was copied from a previously published work by a different author.
3. Retraction Procedure
   1. Retraction can be initiated by Authors, Readers, Reviewers, Editors, and other Publishers by officially appealing to the Editorial Board. An expertise conducted by the Editorial Board can also trigger a retraction procedure.
   2. If the Editorial Board failed to answer a retraction claim from the author within 10 days, the author is free to appeal to the Association of Science Editors and Publishers (ASEP).
   3. If the Editorial Board decides to retract the article based on the violations mentioned above, the Corresponding Author is sent a notification that explains the reasons for the retraction.
   4. The final decision takes into account the explanation given by the Author. Should the author fail to respond within 10 days, the Editors are free to retract the publication without the Author’s concern. Irrespective of the fact whether the Authors accept the standpoint of the editorial board or not, the retraction is an abiding procedure.
   5. The retraction protocol is sent to the corresponding author, the ASEP, eLIBRARY.RU, and CyberLeninka.
   6. A retraction note, which states its reason and date, is published both in the paper and online versions of the Journal. After that, the article will be marked as RETRACTED in all reference databases. Retracted articles are excluded from all citation indices and reference lists and do not affect electronic calculations of one’s personal scientific achievements.
   7. After the retraction procedure has been completed, the Editorial Board retains the right not to accept other manuscripts submitted by the author(s) in question for a certain period.

Subscription indices: E79882 – in the online-store of periodicals "Press by subscription".

To purchase individual issues of the printed version, please contact us at jsocnet@mail.ru or call +7(3842)55-87-61.

The paid-off issues may be collected at the Editorial Office: Kemerovo State University, Office 149, Bld.2, 73, Sovetskii Ave, Kemerovo, Kemerovo region (Kuzbass), 650000, Russia.

How you can subscribing and pay for the issue

Pay online

4 times a year

Alekseev Mihail Kemerovo State University

Bahtina Lina Kemerovo State University

Blinova Mariya Kemerovo State University

Bodyanskaya Alisa Kemerovo State University

Bushev Aleksandr Tver State University
doctor of philological sciences

professor

ELIBRARY: 283492 ORCID:0000-0002-8730-0078

Volkova Evgeniya Tomsk Polytechnic University

Gartung Stella G. I. Nevelskoy Maritime State University

Gnedash Anna Kuban State University

Golev Nikolay Kemerovo State University
doctor of philological sciences

professor

SCOPUS: 56642816700 ELIBRARY: 72297 ORCID:0000-0002-0559-3007

Golovatsky Evgeny Kemerovo State University
employee
doctor of sociological sciences

docent

SCOPUS: 57221856678 ELIBRARY: 299272 ORCID:0000-0002-8485-5852 Web Of Science: U-4714-2017

Gorohova Marina Kemerovo State University

Gur'yanova Anastasiya Kemerovo State University

Dagbaeva Soelma Trans-Baikal State University

Dashkova Svetlana Kemerovo State University

Devyatiyarov Dmitriy Novosibirsk Military Institute of the National Guard Troops of the Russian Federation

Dzvonik Veronika Kemerovo State University
employee

Dreyfel'd Oksana Kemerovo State University

Ermolenkina Larisa Tomsk State Pedagogical University

Irkova Anna Kemerovo State University

Islamov Roman Kemerovo State University

• « 
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
•  »

VAC