Sevastopol, Russian Federation
The article introduces the problem of socially dangerous consequences. Legal studies reveal no uniform approach to the definition of socially dangerous consequences. The author elaborates on the definition of socially dangerous consequences, describes their signs, and defines such concepts as their essence and content, as well as the object of encroachment. Socially dangerous consequences are connected with the criminal act and the object of crime, so the author describes their interdependence, mutual influence, and the derivativeness of socially dangerous consequences from the criminal act. This derivation makes it possible to transfer the signs of the criminal act to the socially dangerous consequences it causes. These signs include: public danger, social character, negativity, and objectivity. The complex of signs of socially dangerous consequences makes up their content. The characteristics of the object of encroachment and the structure of the object demonstrate a one-sided connection of socially dangerous consequences with the object of crime. The signs of socially dangerous consequences result from the signs of the object of encroachment. The author describes the signs of socially dangerous consequences derived from the object of encroachment, as well as the motives for their allocation. The features of each of the indicated signs are irremovability, measurability, heterogeneity, and multiplicity. All the above signs, derived from both the socially dangerous act and the object of crime, belong to socially dangerous consequences. The signs of socially dangerous consequences can be divided into direct and indirect, which together make up the content of the socially dangerous consequences.
socially dangerous consequence, criminal act, object of crime, signs, content, essence, structure, derivative character, objective character, social danger, objectivity, socially negative character, multiplicity, heterogeneity, irremovability, possibility of measurement
1. Borukaeva L. A., Fedorov N. I. Personal freedom of a person in the system of objects of criminal law protection under the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov, 2019, (4): 124-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31085/2310-8681-2019-4-220-124-128
2. Bogunova G. V., Trofimova O. Yu. Differentiation of the composition of kidnapping with related crimes under the criminal code of the Russian Federation. Topical issues of legal science and practice: Proc. III All-Russian Sci.-Prac. Conf. with student participation, Khabarovsk, 30 May 2022. Khabarovsk: PNU, 2022, 19-23. (In Russ.) EDN: OWAHEN
3. Kim E. A. Conditions for the legitimacy of necessary defense. State and law: problems and prospects for improvement: Proc. 5th Intern. Sci. Conf., Kursk, 30 Sep 2022. Kursk: SWSU, 2022, 121-125. (In Russ.) EDN: TSNSNO
4. Selivanov A. V. Problems of crime at the present stage. Topical issues of public order and administrative activities of the police: Proc. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Volgograd, 16-17 Jun 2022. Moscow: Sputnik+, 2022, 162-165. (In Russ.) EDN: CDTRWC
5. Didenko K. N. Criminal offense: concept and perspectives. Issues of development of law and management in modern conditions: Proc. student Sci. Conf., Moscow, 24 Mar 2022. Saratov: Saratovskii istochnik, 2022, 171-175. (In Russ.) EDN: VYOETI
6. Zemlyukov S. V. Criminal-legal problems of criminal harm. Novosibirsk: NSU, 1991, 244. (In Russ.) EDN: SWFYCD
7. Trainin A. N. General doctrine of the composition of the crime. Moscow: Gosiurizdat, 1957, 363. (In Russ.)
8. Kuznetsova N. F. Crime and criminality. Moscow: MSU, 1969, 232. (In Russ.)
9. Korzhanskiy N. I. Object and subject of criminal law protection. Moscow: Ministry of Internal Affairs (Soviet Union), 1980, 248. (In Russ.)
10. Babaev M. M. Social consequences of crime. Moscow: Ministry of Internal Affairs (Soviet Union), 1982, 82. (In Russ.)
11. Zubkov I. F. The course of dialectical materialism. Moscow: FUR, 1990, 258. (In Russ.)
12. Maltsev V. V. The problem of criminal law assessment of socially dangerous consequences. Saratov: Saratov University, 1989, 160. (In Russ.)
13. Demidov Yu. A. Social value and assessment in criminal law. Moscow: Iurid. lit., 1975, 185. (In Russ.)
14. Shubert L. The public danger of a criminal act. Moscow: Gosiurizdat, 1960, 239. (In Russ.)
15. Maltsev V. V. The investigator's assessment of the public danger of encroachment. Volgograd: VSSh, 1986, 60. (In Russ.)
16. Martsev A. I. Crime: socio-legal analysis. Omsk: Omsk Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2012, 75. (In Russ.) EDN: VRSCER
17. Bazarov R. A. A crime. Corpus delicti. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk Law Institute, 1997, 66. (In Russ.)
18. Nikiforov B. S. The object of the crime according to Soviet criminal law. Moscow: Gosiurizdat, 1960, 229. (In Russ.)
19. Tagantsev N. S. Russian Criminal Law: Part of Society. Tula: Avtograph, 2001, vol. 1, 800. (In Russ.)
20. Lyapunov Yu. I. Public danger of an act as a universal category of Soviet criminal law. Moscow: VIuZSh, 1989, 117. (In Russ.)
21. Prokhorov V. S. Crime and responsibility. Leningrad: LSU, 1984, 136. (In Russ.)
22. Tararukhin S. A. Criminal behavior. Social and psychological traits. Moscow: Iurid. lit., 1974, 220. (In Russ.)
23. Mikhlin A. S. The consequences of the crime. Moscow: Iurid. lit., 1969, 104. (In Russ.)
24. Kudryavtsev V. N. The objective side of the crime. Moscow: Gosiurizdat, 1960, 244. (In Russ.)
