Moskva, Russian Federation
Subject: The possibility and specifics of the system-institutional paradigm through the prism of innovation activity management. Objectives: Identification of management problems specific to the organization and explicitly arising as a result of its presentation on the basis of the system-institutional paradigm. Methodology: Institutional and evolutionary economic theories, organizational science, the theories of long waves and management. Results: The research features a system-institutional paradigm according to the organization level, represented in the form of environmental, object, processed, and project systems-institutions. The managing subsystem of such an organization must take into account the peculiarities of the four-element managed subsystem, its institutional features that are important for an effective strategy and tactics to be used by new technological system organizations. Conclusions: The system-institutional paradigm that unites the achievements of G. B. Kleiner and B. H. Yerznkyan’s four-element system methodology can be adapted and successfully applied to the management of organizations of the new technological system. This circumstance poses a number of problems that need to be resolved.
innovation, network effects, long-wave dynamics, relational contracting, startups
1. Kleiner G. B. System paradigm and system management. Russian management journal, 2008, 6(3): 27-50. (In Russ.)
2. Yerznkyan B. H. Towards formation of generalized theory of institutions. Institutional economics: development, teaching, applications: Proc. IV Intern. Sci. Conf., November 17, 2015, ed. Kleiner G. B. Moscow: Izd. dom GUU, 2015, 25-29. (In Russ.)
3. North D. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Moscow: Nachala, 1997, 180. (In Russ.)
4. Makarov V. L. Calculus of institutions. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody, 2003, 39(2): 14-32. (In Russ.)
5. Maevskii V. I., Malkov S. Yu. A new view on the theory of reproduction. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2014, 238. (In Russ.)
6. Greif A. Institutions and the path to the modern economy. Lessons from medieval trade. Moscow: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2013, 532. (In Russ.)
7. Hodgson G. M. What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 2006, 40(1): 1-25.
8. Kleiner G. B. New theory of economic systems: problems of development and use. Evolutionary and institutional economics: discussions, methods and applications. Saint-Petersburg: Aleteiia, 2012, 14-46. (In Russ.)
9. Williamson O. E. The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 2000, 38(3): 595-613.
10. Williamson O. E. The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. Saint-Petersburg: Lenizdat; CEV Press, 1996, 702. (In Russ.)
11. Hodgson G. M. Economics and institutions: a manifesto of a modern institutional economics. Moscow: Delo, 2003, 464. (In Russ.)
12. Yerznkyan B. H., Delibašić M., Grgurević N. Institutional behavior: theoretical issues and practical manifestations. Economics of contemporary Russia, 2014, (4): 19-30. (In Russ.)
13. Aghion Ph., Tirole J. Opening the black box of innovation. European Economic Review, 1994, 38(3-4): 701-710.
14. Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Moscow: Finstatinform, 2000, 474. (In Russ.)
15. Yerznkyan B. H. Institutional reinforcement: three types of relationships. Journal of institutional studies, 2017, 9(1): 27-38. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2017.9.1.027-038
16. Perez C. Technological revolutions and financial capital. The dynamics of bubbles and golden ages. Moscow: Delo, 2011, 232. (In Russ.)
17. Dementyev E. V. Factors of cyclicity of radical innovations. The evolution of economic theory: economic reproduction, technology, institutions. Saint-Petersburg: Aleteiia, 2015, 14-46. (In Russ.)
18. Lvov D. S., Glaziev S. Yu. Theoretical and application aspects of managing the scientific-technological progress. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody, 1987, 23(5): 793-804. (In Russ.)
19. Yerznkyan B. H. Techno-economic paradigm of Carlota Perez: the omportance and the possibilities of applying. Finance and real sector: interaction and competence. Saint-Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriia, 2013, 28-42. (In Russ.)
20. Yerznkyan B. H., Akinfeeva E. V. Institutional features of large-scale innovation clusters (on the example of Skolkovo and Silicon Valley). Upravlenie, 2016, 5(1): 59-63. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/18793
